Liu Hui, Sultan Muhammad Abdul Rab Faisal, Liu Xiang Li, Zhang Jin, Yu Fei, Zhao Hui Xian
College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, P.R. China.
College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, P.R. China; State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 10;10(4):e0121852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121852. eCollection 2015.
To determine the proteomic-level responses of drought tolerant wild wheat (Triticum boeoticum), physiological and comparative proteomic analyses were conducted using the roots and the leaves of control and short term drought-stressed plants. Drought stress was imposed by transferring hydroponically grown seedlings at the 3-leaf stage into 1/2 Hoagland solution containing 20% PEG-6000 for 48 h. Root and leaf samples were separately collected at 0 (control), 24, and 48 h of drought treatment for analysis. Physiological analysis indicated that abscisic acid (ABA) level was greatly increased in the drought-treated plants, but the increase was greater and more rapid in the leaves than in the roots. The net photosynthetic rate of the wild wheat leaves was significantly decreased under short-term drought stress. The deleterious effects of drought on the studied traits mainly targeted photosynthesis. Comparative proteomic analysis identified 98 and 85 differently changed protein spots (DEPs) (corresponding to 87 and 80 unique proteins, respectively) in the leaves and the roots, respectively, with only 6 mutual unique proteins in the both organs. An impressive 86% of the DEPs were implicated in detoxification and defense, carbon metabolism, amino acid and nitrogen metabolism, proteins metabolism, chaperones, transcription and translation, photosynthesis, nucleotide metabolism, and signal transduction. Further analysis revealed some mutual and tissue-specific responses to short-term drought in the leaves and the roots. The differences of drought-response between the roots and the leaves mainly included that signal sensing and transduction-associated proteins were greatly up-regulated in the roots. Photosynthesis and carbon fixation ability were decreased in the leaves. Glycolysis was down-regulated but PPP pathway enhanced in the roots, resulting in occurrence of complex changes in energy metabolism and establishment of a new homeostasis. Protein metabolism was down-regulated in the roots, but enhanced in the leaves. These results will contribute to the existing knowledge on the complexity of root and leaf protein changes that occur in response to drought, and also provide a framework for further functional studies on the identified proteins.
为了确定耐旱野生小麦(一粒小麦)在蛋白质组水平上的响应,利用对照植株和短期干旱胁迫植株的根和叶进行了生理和比较蛋白质组分析。干旱胁迫是通过将水培生长至三叶期的幼苗转移到含有20%聚乙二醇-6000的1/2霍格兰溶液中处理48小时来施加的。在干旱处理的0(对照)、24和48小时分别收集根和叶样本进行分析。生理分析表明,干旱处理植株中脱落酸(ABA)水平大幅增加,但叶片中的增加幅度更大且更迅速。短期干旱胁迫下,野生小麦叶片的净光合速率显著降低。干旱对所研究性状的有害影响主要针对光合作用。比较蛋白质组分析分别在叶片和根中鉴定出98个和85个差异变化的蛋白质斑点(DEPs)(分别对应87个和80个独特蛋白质),两个器官中仅有6个共同的独特蛋白质。令人印象深刻的是,86%的DEPs涉及解毒与防御、碳代谢、氨基酸和氮代谢、蛋白质代谢、伴侣蛋白、转录与翻译、光合作用、核苷酸代谢以及信号转导。进一步分析揭示了叶片和根对短期干旱的一些共同和组织特异性响应。根和叶之间干旱响应的差异主要包括:与信号感知和转导相关的蛋白质在根中大幅上调;叶片中的光合作用和碳固定能力下降;根中的糖酵解下调但磷酸戊糖途径增强,导致能量代谢发生复杂变化并建立新的稳态;根中的蛋白质代谢下调,但在叶片中增强。这些结果将有助于丰富关于干旱响应过程中根和叶蛋白质变化复杂性的现有知识,也为进一步对鉴定出的蛋白质进行功能研究提供了框架。