Commentary: Balancing automated procedures for confounding control with background knowledge.
作者信息
Wyss Richard, Stürmer Til
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
出版信息
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):279-81. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000068.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: Balancing automated procedures for confounding control with background knowledge.
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):279-81. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000068.
2
Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):268-78. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000069.
3
Control for confounding in case-control studies using the stratification score, a retrospective balancing score.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):752-60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq406. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
4
Misuse of Regression Adjustment for Additional Confounders Following Insufficient Propensity Score Balancing.
Epidemiology. 2019 Jul;30(4):541-548. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001023.
5
Variable selection for propensity score estimation via balancing covariates.
Epidemiology. 2015 Mar;26(2):e14-5. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000237.
6
Role of disease risk scores in comparative effectiveness research with emerging therapies.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):138-47. doi: 10.1002/pds.3231.
7
Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.236. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
8
The obesity paradox: perception vs knowledge.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Feb;85(2):112-4. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0777.
9
Long-term effects of antiepileptic therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in children.
Neurol India. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):504. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.55585.
10
Confronting "confounding by health system use" in Medicare Part D: comparative effectiveness of propensity score approaches to confounding adjustment.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):90-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.3250.
引用本文的文献
1
Targeted learning with an undersmoothed LASSO propensity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health-care database studies.
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Nov 4;193(11):1632-1640. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae023.
2
Machine learning for improving high-dimensional proxy confounder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Sep;31(9):932-943. doi: 10.1002/pds.5500. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.236. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
The "Dry-Run" Analysis: A Method for Evaluating Risk Scores for Confounding Control.
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 May 1;185(9):842-852. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx032.
5
Big data for bipolar disorder.
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2016 Dec;4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40345-016-0051-7. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Comment on ‘Causal inference, probability theory, and graphical insights’ by Stuart G. Baker.
Stat Med. 2013 Nov 10;32(25):4331-3. doi: 10.1002/sim.5901.
2
Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):268-78. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000069.
3
Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 15;176(10):938-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws165. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
4
Using high-dimensional propensity scores to automate confounding control in a distributed medical product safety surveillance system.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:41-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.2328.
5
Invited commentary: understanding bias amplification.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec 1;174(11):1223-7; discussion pg 1228-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr352. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
6
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec 1;174(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr364. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
7
Re: Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Oct;20(10):1110-1; author reply 1112. doi: 10.1002/pds.2238.
8
Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):849-57. doi: 10.1002/pds.2152. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
9
Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1404-13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr001. Epub 2011 May 20.
10
The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustration.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):551-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.2098. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Zotero 插件