Guardino Christine M, Schetter Christine Dunkel
Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(1):70-94. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.752659. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
Extensive evidence documents that prenatal maternal stress predicts a variety of adverse physical and psychological health outcomes for the mother and baby. However, the importance of the ways that women cope with stress during pregnancy is less clear. We conducted a systematic review of the English-language literature on coping behaviours and coping styles in pregnancy using PsycInfo and PubMed to identify 45 cross-sectional and longitudinal studies involving 16,060 participants published between January 1990 and June 2012. Although results were often inconsistent across studies, the literature provides some evidence that avoidant coping behaviours or styles and poor coping skills in general are associated with postpartum depression, preterm birth and infant development. Variability in study methods including differences in sample characteristics, timing of assessments, outcome variables and measures of coping styles or behaviours may explain the lack of consistent associations. To advance the scientific study of coping in pregnancy, we call attention to the need for a priori hypotheses and greater use of pregnancy-specific, daily process, and skills-based approaches. There is promise in continuing this area of research, particularly in the possible translation of consistent findings to effective interventions, but only if the conceptual basis and methodological quality of research improve.
大量证据表明,产前母亲压力预示着母亲和婴儿会出现各种不良的身心健康结果。然而,女性在孕期应对压力的方式的重要性尚不清楚。我们使用PsycInfo和PubMed对关于孕期应对行为和应对方式的英文文献进行了系统综述,以识别1990年1月至2012年6月期间发表的45项涉及16,060名参与者的横断面和纵向研究。尽管各研究结果往往不一致,但文献提供了一些证据,表明回避型应对行为或方式以及总体较差的应对技能与产后抑郁、早产和婴儿发育有关。研究方法的差异,包括样本特征、评估时间、结果变量以及应对方式或行为测量方法的不同,可能解释了为何缺乏一致的关联。为推动孕期应对的科学研究,我们提请注意需要有先验假设,并更多地采用针对孕期的、日常过程的和基于技能的方法。继续开展这一研究领域是有前景的,特别是在将一致的研究结果转化为有效干预措施方面,但前提是研究的概念基础和方法质量得到改善。