Matsumura Yuki, Hishida Tomoyuki, Shimada Yoshihisa, Ishii Genichiro, Aokage Keiju, Yoshida Junji, Nagai Kanji
*Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; and †Pathology Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Mar;9(3):337-44. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000073.
Lymphatic permeation has been reported as a prognostic factor for patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lymphatic canals are located in both intratumoral and extratumoral areas. Since 2001, we have prospectively evaluated lymphatic permeation based on its location. The purpose of this study was to determine the survival impact of extratumoral lymphatic permeation in patients with resected NSCLC by analyzing the long-term follow-up data.
We reviewed 1069 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent complete resection between 2001 and 2006. Lymphatic permeation was classified as follows: ly0, absence of lymphatic permeation; ly1, intratumoral; and ly2, extratumoral.
There were 845 patients (79%) with ly0, 134 (12%) with ly1, and 90 (9%) with ly2. Ly2 was more frequently observed in patients with advanced disease and intrapulmonary metastases than ly0-1. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the ly0, ly1, and ly2 groups were 75%, 63%, and 34%, respectively. The OS rate was significantly worse in the ly2 group compared with OS rate in the ly0 (p < 0.01) and ly1 groups (p < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, ly2 proved to be an independent poor prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 1.73; p < 0.01). OS and recurrence-free survival of patients with T1 and T2 tumors with ly2 were not statistically different from that of the patients with T3 tumor (OS, p = 0.43 and p = 0.77; recurrence-free survival, p = 0.94 and p = 0.94, respectively).
The adverse prognostic impact of lymphatic permeation was remarkably different whether it is detected in intratumoral or extratumoral lymphatic canals. We recommend that lymphatic permeation in resected NSCLC should be evaluated by considering its location.
淋巴渗透已被报道为接受手术切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一个预后因素。淋巴管存在于肿瘤内和肿瘤外区域。自2001年以来,我们根据淋巴渗透的位置对其进行了前瞻性评估。本研究的目的是通过分析长期随访数据,确定手术切除的NSCLC患者肿瘤外淋巴渗透对生存的影响。
我们回顾了2001年至2006年间连续接受完全切除的1069例NSCLC患者。淋巴渗透分类如下:ly0,无淋巴渗透;ly1,肿瘤内;ly2,肿瘤外。
有845例(79%)患者为ly0,134例(12%)为ly1,90例(9%)为ly2。与ly0-1相比,ly2在晚期疾病和肺内转移患者中更常见。ly0、ly1和ly2组的5年总生存率(OS)分别为75%、63%和34%。与ly0组(p<0.01)和ly1组(p<0.01)相比,ly2组的OS率明显更差。在多变量分析中,ly2被证明是一个独立的不良预后因素(风险比,1.73;p<0.01)。ly2的T1和T2肿瘤患者的OS和无复发生存率与T3肿瘤患者的OS和无复发生存率无统计学差异(OS,p=0.43和p=0.77;无复发生存率,p=0.94和p=0.94)。
在肿瘤内或肿瘤外淋巴管中检测到的淋巴渗透对预后的不良影响显著不同。我们建议在评估手术切除的NSCLC时应考虑淋巴渗透的位置。