Suppr超能文献

喷雾干燥法用两种益生元胶体保护干鼠李糖乳杆菌以提高其存活率。

Protection of L. rhamnosus by spray-drying using two prebiotics colloids to enhance the viability.

机构信息

Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos (CEPROBI) del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Yautepec, Morelos, Mexico.

Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Mexico.

出版信息

Carbohydr Polym. 2014 Feb 15;102:423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.033. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Abstract

Protection of probiotics by substances considered as prebiotics can be an alternative to increase their viability in the large intestine. The objective of this study was to use two wall materials (native rice starch and inulin) without bonding agent to protect Lactobacillus rhamnosus during spray-drying and determine the viability of the microorganism under two storage conditions. For spray-drying conditions tested in this work the product yield with native rice starch (NRS) ranged between 65% and 74% whereas for inulin (IN) it ranged between 43% and 54%. In general, IN solutions exhibited higher outlet temperature than NRS dispersions. Capsules of IN had smaller particle size than those of NRS. Due to the higher hydrophilic nature of IN capsules as compared to NRS, IN capsules exhibited higher water activity than NRS capsules. Confocal microscopy showed marked differences between both wall materials, which could in turn cause differences in the release profile of encapsulated microorganisms. Agglomerates of NRS provided better protection to the microorganisms as evidenced by the lower reduction in viability when compared to IN, and this effect was corroborated by the stability study. It is possible to protect probiotics using both colloids, but differences in the viability and stability during storage were determined. The use of IN could prove beneficial in the encapsulation of probiotic strains since this carbohydrate is not hydrolyzed by human digestive enzymes and may act as prebiotic.

摘要

通过将被认为是益生元的物质来保护益生菌可以作为增加其在大肠中存活能力的一种替代方法。本研究的目的是使用两种壁材(天然米淀粉和菊粉)而不使用结合剂来保护鼠李糖乳杆菌在喷雾干燥过程中的生存能力,并在两种储存条件下确定微生物的生存能力。在这项工作中测试的喷雾干燥条件下,天然米淀粉(NRS)的产物产率在 65%到 74%之间,而菊粉(IN)的产率在 43%到 54%之间。一般来说,IN 溶液的出口温度高于 NRS 分散体。IN 胶囊的粒径小于 NRS 胶囊。由于 IN 胶囊比 NRS 胶囊具有更高的亲水性,因此 IN 胶囊的水分活度高于 NRS 胶囊。共聚焦显微镜显示了两种壁材之间的明显差异,这反过来又可能导致包封微生物的释放特性不同。NRS 团聚体为微生物提供了更好的保护,这从与 IN 相比,其生存能力降低的幅度较小就可以证明,这一效应也得到了稳定性研究的证实。可以使用这两种胶体来保护益生菌,但是在储存过程中的生存能力和稳定性存在差异。由于这种碳水化合物不会被人体消化酶水解,因此可能作为益生元,因此使用 IN 可能有助于包封益生菌菌株。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验