1] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China [2] Department of Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;109(4):521-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.13. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
Although esophageal motor disorders are associated with chest pain and dysphagia, minimal data support a direct relationship between abnormal motor function and symptoms. This study investigated whether high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics correlate with symptoms.
Consecutive HRM patients without previous surgery were enrolled. HRM studies included 10 supine liquid, 5 upright liquid, 2 upright viscous, and 2 upright solid swallows. All patients evaluated their esophageal symptom for each upright swallow. Symptoms were graded on a 4-point likert score (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe). The individual liquid, viscous or solid upright swallow with the maximal symptom score was selected for analysis in each patient. HRM metrics were compared between groups with and without symptoms during the upright liquid protocol and the provocative protocols separately.
A total of 269 patients recorded symptoms during the upright liquid swallows and 72 patients had a swallow symptom score of 1 or greater. Of the 269 patients, 116 recorded symptoms during viscous or solid swallows. HRM metrics were similar between swallows with and without associated symptoms in the upright, viscous, and solid swallows. No correlation was noted between HRM metrics and symptom scores among swallow types.
Esophageal symptoms are not related to abnormal motor function defined by HRM during liquid, viscous or solid bolus swallows in the upright position. Other factors beyond circular muscle contraction patterns should be explored as possible causes of symptom generation.
尽管食管运动障碍与胸痛和吞咽困难有关,但仅有少量数据支持异常运动功能与症状之间存在直接关系。本研究旨在调查高分辨率测压(HRM)指标是否与症状相关。
连续纳入无既往手术史的 HRM 患者。HRM 研究包括 10 例仰卧位液体吞咽、5 例直立位液体吞咽、2 例直立位粘性吞咽和 2 例直立位固体吞咽。所有患者均对每例直立位吞咽时的食管症状进行评估。症状按 4 分 Likert 评分(0 分,无症状;1 分,轻度;2 分,中度;3 分,重度)进行分级。每位患者选择直立位液体吞咽时症状评分最高的液体、粘性或固体吞咽进行分析。分别比较直立位液体协议和激发性协议中伴或不伴症状的患者之间 HRM 指标的差异。
共有 269 例患者记录了直立位液体吞咽时的症状,72 例患者的吞咽症状评分为 1 或更高。在 269 例患者中,116 例记录了粘性或固体吞咽时的症状。直立位、粘性和固体吞咽时,有症状和无症状吞咽的 HRM 指标无差异。在不同吞咽类型中,HRM 指标与症状评分之间无相关性。
在直立位液体、粘性或固体吞咽时,食管症状与 HRM 定义的异常运动功能无关。应探索环形肌肉收缩模式以外的其他因素,作为产生症状的可能原因。