Cate David M, Nanthasurasak Pavisara, Riwkulkajorn Pornpak, L'Orange Christian, Henry Charles S, Volckens John
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 May;58(4):413-23. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/met078. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
Metals in particulate matter (PM) are considered a driving factor for many pathologies. Despite the hazards associated with particulate metals, personal exposures for at-risk workers are rarely assessed due to the cost and effort associated with monitoring. As a result, routine exposure assessments are performed for only a small fraction of the exposed workforce. The objective of this research was to evaluate a relatively new technology, microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (µPADs), for measuring the metals content in welding fumes. Fumes from three common welding techniques (shielded metal arc, metal inert gas, and tungsten inert gas welding) were sampled in two welding shops. Concentrations of acid-extractable Fe, Cu, Ni, and Cr were measured and independently verified using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Results from the µPAD sensors agreed well with ICP-OES analysis; the two methods gave statistically similar results in >80% of the samples analyzed. Analytical costs for the µPAD technique were ~50 times lower than market-rate costs with ICP-OES. Further, the µPAD method was capable of providing same-day results (as opposed several weeks for ICP laboratory analysis). Results of this work suggest that µPAD sensors are a viable, yet inexpensive alternative to traditional analytic methods for transition metals in welding fume PM. These sensors have potential to enable substantially higher levels of hazard surveillance for a given resource cost, especially in resource-limited environments.
颗粒物(PM)中的金属被认为是许多病症的驱动因素。尽管颗粒物金属存在危害,但由于监测相关的成本和工作量,高危工人的个人暴露情况很少得到评估。因此,仅对一小部分受暴露的劳动力进行常规暴露评估。本研究的目的是评估一种相对较新的技术,即微流控纸基分析装置(µPADs),用于测量焊接烟尘中的金属含量。在两个焊接车间采集了三种常见焊接技术(手工电弧焊、熔化极气体保护焊和钨极气体保护焊)产生的烟尘。测量了酸可提取的铁、铜、镍和铬的浓度,并使用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)进行独立验证。µPAD传感器的结果与ICP-OES分析结果吻合良好;在>80%的分析样品中,这两种方法给出的统计结果相似。µPAD技术的分析成本比ICP-OES的市场价格成本低约50倍。此外,µPAD方法能够提供当天结果(而ICP实验室分析需要几周时间)。这项工作的结果表明,µPAD传感器是焊接烟尘PM中过渡金属传统分析方法的一种可行且廉价的替代方法。这些传感器有可能在给定的资源成本下实现更高水平的危害监测,特别是在资源有限的环境中。