• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰老年人对水果、蔬菜和鱼类饮食指南的遵循情况;教育、收入和职业声望的作用。

Adherence to dietary guidelines for fruit, vegetables and fish among older Dutch adults; the role of education, income and job prestige.

作者信息

Dijkstra S C, Neter J E, Brouwer I A, Huisman M, Visser M

机构信息

S. Coosje Dijkstra, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Tel: +31 (0)20 5986128, Fax: +31 (0)20 5986940, E-mail address:

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(2):115-21. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0402-3.

DOI:10.1007/s12603-013-0402-3
PMID:24522461
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about socio-economic differences in dietary intake among older adults. In this study we describe self-reported dietary adherence to the fruit, vegetables and fish guidelines among older Dutch adults and investigate the independent associations of three socio-economic status (SES) indicators with adherence to these guidelines.

DESIGN

Cross sectional data-analyses.

SETTINGS

The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), the Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

1057 community dwelling older adults, aged 55-85 years.

MEASUREMENTS

Fruit, vegetable and fish intake was assessed using a short food frequency questionnaire. We measured SES using self-reported levels of education, household income and occupational prestige.

RESULTS

82.5% of the respondents reported to adhere to the fruit guideline, 65.1% to the vegetables guideline, and 31.7% to the fish guideline. After adjustment for confounders and the other two SES indicators, respondents in the lowest education group adhered less often to the vegetables guideline (OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.22-0.70)) compared to those in the highest education group. Respondents in the lowest income group adhered less often to the fruit (0.44 (95 % CI 0.22-0.91) and fish guideline (OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.33-0.91) compared to those in the highest groups. Occupational prestige was not independently associated with adherence any the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported adherence to the fruit, vegetables and fish guidelines among older adults can be improved and particularly in those with a low SES. Education and income have independent and unique contributions to dietary adherence. Future research should investigate potential pathways through which these specific SES indicators influence dietary adherence.

摘要

目的

关于老年人饮食摄入方面的社会经济差异,人们了解得很少。在本研究中,我们描述了荷兰老年成年人自我报告的对水果、蔬菜和鱼类指南的饮食遵循情况,并调查了三种社会经济地位(SES)指标与遵循这些指南之间的独立关联。

设计

横断面数据分析。

背景

荷兰阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究(LASA)。

研究对象

1057名年龄在55 - 85岁之间的社区居住老年人。

测量方法

使用简短食物频率问卷评估水果、蔬菜和鱼类的摄入量。我们通过自我报告的教育水平、家庭收入和职业声望来衡量社会经济地位。

结果

82.5%的受访者报告遵循水果指南,65.1%遵循蔬菜指南,31.7%遵循鱼类指南。在对混杂因素和其他两个社会经济地位指标进行调整后,与最高教育组相比,最低教育组的受访者较少遵循蔬菜指南(比值比0.39(95%置信区间0.22 - 0.70))。与最高收入组相比,最低收入组的受访者较少遵循水果指南(0.44(95%置信区间0.22 - 0.91))和鱼类指南(比值比0.55(95%置信区间0.33 - 0.91))。职业声望与遵循任何指南均无独立关联。

结论

老年人自我报告的对水果、蔬菜和鱼类指南的遵循情况可以得到改善,尤其是在社会经济地位较低的人群中。教育和收入对饮食遵循有独立且独特的影响。未来的研究应调查这些特定社会经济地位指标影响饮食遵循的潜在途径。

相似文献

1
Adherence to dietary guidelines for fruit, vegetables and fish among older Dutch adults; the role of education, income and job prestige.荷兰老年人对水果、蔬菜和鱼类饮食指南的遵循情况;教育、收入和职业声望的作用。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(2):115-21. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0402-3.
2
The role of perceived barriers in explaining socio-economic status differences in adherence to the fruit, vegetable and fish guidelines in older adults: a mediation study.感知障碍在解释老年人遵守水果、蔬菜和鱼类指南方面社会经济地位差异中的作用:一项中介研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Apr;18(5):797-808. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001487. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
3
Misperception of self-reported adherence to the fruit, vegetable and fish guidelines in older Dutch adults.荷兰老年人对自我报告的水果、蔬菜和鱼类指南依从性的错误认知。
Appetite. 2014 Nov;82:166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
4
Dutch food bank recipients have poorer dietary intakes than the general and low-socioeconomic status Dutch adult population.荷兰食品银行的领取者的饮食摄入比一般和社会经济地位较低的荷兰成年人口更差。
Eur J Nutr. 2018 Dec;57(8):2747-2758. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1540-x. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
Socio-economic differences in the change of fruit and vegetable intakes among Dutch adults between 2004 and 2011: the GLOBE study.2004 年至 2011 年间荷兰成年人水果和蔬菜摄入量变化的社会经济差异:GLOBE 研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun;21(9):1704-1716. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017004219. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
6
Relationship between diet quality and cognition depends on socioeconomic position in healthy older adults.在健康的老年人中,饮食质量与认知之间的关系取决于社会经济地位。
J Nutr. 2013 Nov;143(11):1767-73. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.181115. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Intake of Vegetables, Fruit, and Fish is Beneficial for Age-Related Macular Degeneration.蔬菜、水果和鱼类的摄入有益于年龄相关性黄斑变性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;198:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Socio-economic status, dietary intake and 10 y trends: the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey.社会经济地位、饮食摄入与10年趋势:荷兰全国食品消费调查
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jan;57(1):128-37. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601503.
9
Socio-economic dietary inequalities in UK adults: an updated picture of key food groups and nutrients from national surveillance data.英国成年人的社会经济饮食不平等:基于国家监测数据的主要食物类别和营养素最新情况
Br J Nutr. 2015 Jan 14;113(1):181-9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514002621. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
10
A school based study of time trends in food habits and their relation to socio-economic status among Norwegian adolescents, 2001-2009.一项关于2001年至2009年挪威青少年饮食习惯的时间趋势及其与社会经济地位关系的基于学校的研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Sep 25;11:115. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0115-y.

引用本文的文献

1
How are socioeconomic status, social support, and health history associated with unhealthy lifestyle behaviours in middle-aged adults? Results of the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) COHORT.社会经济地位、社会支持和健康史如何与中年成年人的不健康生活方式行为相关联?瑞典心肺生物影像研究(SCAPIS)队列研究结果。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 24;83(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01513-7.
2
Characteristics associated with fruit and vegetable consumption in mid aged and older Chinese men and women: a cross-sectional analysis of the first wave of WHO SAGE China.中国中老年男性和女性的水果和蔬菜消费特征:对世卫组织 SAGE 中国第一波调查的横断面分析。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 28;132(6):805-814. doi: 10.1017/S000711452400151X. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide.世卫组织欧洲健康决定因素和卫生鸿沟审查。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):1011-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
2
Lifestyle, social factors, and survival after age 75: population based study.75 岁以上人群的生活方式、社会因素与生存状况:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2012 Aug 29;345:e5568. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5568.
3
Fish consumption and CHD mortality: an updated meta-analysis of seventeen cohort studies.鱼类摄入与冠心病死亡率:十七项队列研究的更新荟萃分析。
Dietary Behavior and Determinants of Diet Quality among Primary Health Care Patients in Poland.波兰初级保健患者的饮食行为和饮食质量决定因素。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 23;16(7):925. doi: 10.3390/nu16070925.
4
Influence of education and subjective financial status on dietary habits among young, middle-aged, and older adults in Japan: a cross-sectional study.日本年轻人、中年人和老年人的教育和主观财务状况对饮食习惯的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;23(1):1230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16131-7.
5
Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Associated to Fruits and Vegetables Consumption in Elderly Europeans: A Systematic Review.与欧洲老年人水果和蔬菜消费相关的人口统计学和社会经济因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043442.
6
The cost of healthy versus current diets in the Netherlands for households with a low, middle and high education.荷兰低、中、高学历家庭选择健康饮食与当前饮食的成本对比。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Nov 25;20:101296. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101296. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Estimation and predictors of the Omega-3 Index in the UK Biobank.英国生物库中 Omega-3 指数的估算及其预测因子。
Br J Nutr. 2023 Jul 28;130(2):312-322. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522003282. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Beyond the Individual -A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Mapping of Ecological Determinants of Eating Behavior in Older Adults.超越个体——老年人饮食行为生态决定因素的范围综述与文献计量映射
Public Health Rev. 2022 Aug 3;43:1604967. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604967. eCollection 2022.
9
Differences in Dietary Patterns among the Polish Elderly: A Challenge for Public Health.波兰老年人饮食模式的差异:公共卫生面临的挑战。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 7;13(11):3966. doi: 10.3390/nu13113966.
10
To what extent do dietary costs explain socio-economic differences in dietary behavior?饮食成本在多大程度上解释了饮食行为的社会经济差异?
Nutr J. 2020 Aug 24;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00608-x.
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Apr;15(4):725-37. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002254. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
4
Nutrition knowledge: a mediator between socioeconomic position and diet quality in Australian first-time mothers.营养知识:澳大利亚初产妇社会经济地位与饮食质量之间的中介因素。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 May;111(5):696-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.02.011.
5
Do effects of price discounts and nutrition education on food purchases vary by ethnicity, income and education? Results from a randomised, controlled trial.价格折扣和营养教育对食品购买的影响是否因种族、收入和教育程度而异?一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Oct;65(10):902-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.118588. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
6
Promoting healthy ageing: the importance of lifestyle.促进健康老龄化:生活方式的重要性。
Nurs Stand. 2011;25(19):43-9; quiz 50. doi: 10.7748/ns2011.01.25.19.43.c8270.
7
Cohort profile: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.队列简介:阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):868-76. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq219. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
8
Dietary patterns and survival of older adults.老年人的饮食模式与生存情况
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jan;111(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.012.
9
Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables and future cancer incidence in selected European countries.增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量与选定欧洲国家未来癌症发病率的关系。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Sep;46(14):2563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.026.
10
Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.水果和蔬菜摄入量与 2 型糖尿病发病率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 18;341:c4229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4229.