Hicks Jason L, Starns Jeffrey J
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803-5501, USA,
Mem Cognit. 2014 Jul;42(5):742-54. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0397-y.
In seven experiments, we explored the potential for strength-based, within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory. People studied a mix of target words, some presented four times (strong) and others studied once (weak). In Experiments 1, 2, 4A, and 4B, the test was organized into alternating blocks of 10, 20, or 40 trials. Each block contained lures intermixed with strong targets only or weak targets only. In strength-cued conditions, test probes appeared in a unique font color for strong and weak blocks. In the uncued conditions of Experiments 1 and 2, similar strength blocks were tested, but strength was not cued with font color. False alarms to lures were lower in blocks containing strong target words, as compared with lures in blocks containing weak targets, but only when strength was cued with font color. Providing test feedback in Experiment 2 did not alter these results. In Experiments 3A-3C, test items were presented in a random order (i.e., not blocked by strength). Of these three experiments, only one demonstrated a significant shift even though strength cues were provided. Overall, the criterion shift was larger and more reliable as block size increased, and the shift occurred only when strength was cued with font color. These results clarify the factors that affect participants' willingness to change their response criterion within a test list.
在七项实验中,我们探究了识别记忆中基于强度的列表内标准转换的可能性。人们学习了混合的目标词,其中一些呈现四次(强),另一些学习一次(弱)。在实验1、2、4A和4B中,测试被组织成10、20或40次试验的交替块。每个块包含仅与强目标或仅与弱目标混合的诱饵。在强度提示条件下,测试探针在强块和弱块中以独特的字体颜色出现。在实验1和2的无提示条件下,测试了类似的强度块,但强度没有用字体颜色提示。与包含弱目标的块中的诱饵相比,包含强目标词的块中对诱饵的错误警报更低,但仅当强度用字体颜色提示时才是如此。在实验2中提供测试反馈并没有改变这些结果。在实验3A - 3C中,测试项目以随机顺序呈现(即不按强度分块)。在这三个实验中,即使提供了强度提示,也只有一个显示出显著的转换。总体而言,随着块大小的增加,标准转换更大且更可靠,并且只有当强度用字体颜色提示时才会发生转换。这些结果阐明了影响参与者在测试列表内改变其反应标准意愿的因素。