Suppr超能文献

预防性抗生素与伤口感染

Prophylactic antibiotics and wound infection.

作者信息

Elbur Abubaker Ibrahim, M A Yousif, El-Sayed Ahmed S A, Abdel-Rahman Manar E

机构信息

Faculty, Pharmacy Practice Research Unit (PPRU), College of Pharmacy, Taif University, KSA.

Professor, Pharmacy Practice Research Unit (PPRU), College of Pharmacy, Taif University, KSA.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Dec;7(12):2747-51. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6409.3751. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infections account for 14%-25% of all nosocomial infections. The main aims of this study were to audit the use of prophylactic antibiotic, to quantify the rate of post-operative wound infection, and to identify risk factors for its occurrence in general surgery.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the General Surgery Department in Khartoum Teaching Hospital- Sudan. All Adult patients (age ≥18 years) admitted during March 1(st) to 31(st) October 2010 were recruited. Multivariable logistic analysis was done to identify wound infection risk factors. Prescriptions were audited against predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 540 patients were recruited; (females73.7% of total ). The performed surgical procedures were 547. The rate of wound infection was 10.9%. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that; ASA score ≥ 3; (p= <0.001), wound class (p= 0.001), and laparoscopic surgical technique; (p= 0.002) were significantly associated with prevalence of wound infection. Surgical prophylaxis was unnecessarily given to 311 (97.5%) of 319 patients for whom it was not recommended. Prophylaxis was recommended for 221 patients; of them 218 (98.6 %) were given preoperative dose in the operating rooms. Evaluation of prescriptions for those patients showed that; spectrum of antibiotic was adequate for 160 (73.4%) patients, 143 (65.6%) were given accurate doses, only 4 (1.8%) had the first preoperative dose/s in proper time window, and for 186 (85.3%) of them prophylaxis was extended post-operatively. Only 36 (6.7%) prescriptions were found to be complying with the stated criteria.

CONCLUSION

The rate of wound infection was high and prophylactic antibiotics were irrationally used. Multiple interventions are needed to correct the situation.

摘要

引言

手术部位感染占所有医院感染的14%-25%。本研究的主要目的是审核预防性抗生素的使用情况,量化术后伤口感染率,并确定普通外科手术中伤口感染的危险因素。

方法

在苏丹喀土穆教学医院普通外科进行了一项横断面研究。纳入了2010年3月1日至10月31日期间收治的所有成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。采用多变量逻辑分析来确定伤口感染的危险因素。根据预定标准对处方进行审核。

结果

共纳入540例患者;(女性占总数的73.7%)。共进行了547例外科手术。伤口感染率为10.9%。多变量逻辑分析显示;美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥3;(p=<0.001)、伤口分级(p=0.001)和腹腔镜手术技术;(p=0.002)与伤口感染的发生率显著相关。在319例不推荐使用预防性抗生素的患者中,有311例(97.5%)不必要地接受了预防性抗生素治疗。建议对221例患者进行预防性用药;其中218例(98.6%)在手术室接受了术前剂量。对这些患者的处方评估显示;160例(73.4%)患者的抗生素谱足够,143例(65.6%)给予了准确剂量,只有4例(1.8%)在适当的时间窗内给予了第一剂术前剂量,186例(85.3%)患者的预防性用药在术后延长。只有36例(6.7%)处方符合规定标准。

结论

伤口感染率较高,预防性抗生素使用不合理。需要采取多种干预措施来纠正这种情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验