• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲在早产儿分娩过程中的决策和家长参与方面存在差异。

European variation in decision-making and parental involvement during preterm birth.

机构信息

Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, , London, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 May;99(3):F245-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305191. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2013-305191
PMID:24554563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth is a major global public health issue due to its prevalence, impact upon morbidity and mortality, and subsequent cost implications. Yet, policy analysis has not been undertaken to understand the different approaches across Europe to treatment decisions, and parental involvement in these decisions.

METHODS

A European survey and national guidance documentation analysis was undertaken with national neonatal or paediatric societies in Europe, exploring treatment decisions and parental involvement in decision-making for babies born at 22 to 25 completed weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 19 European countries of 28 contacted. At 25 weeks of gestation there was universal initiation of active care at birth. At 24 weeks policy varied from initiating interventions (9), interventions dependent upon infant condition (8) and resuscitation restrictions (2). At 23 weeks and below, policy varied from no active intervention (7), individualised decision-making (8), parental permission required (3) and universal initiation of interventions (1). There were significant variations in the involvement of parents in the development of policy and in 16 countries the final decision regarding interventions rested with the attending doctor.

IMPLICATIONS

There was little consensus as to how active intervention after birth at 22 to 25 weeks of gestation is managed, nor were parents included in the development of policy in many countries. At extremely low gestational ages, the criteria for or against active intervention at birth vary widely between different health systems in Europe.

摘要

背景

早产是一个全球性的主要公共卫生问题,因为它的普遍性、对发病率和死亡率的影响,以及随后的成本影响。然而,尚未进行政策分析,以了解欧洲在治疗决策方面的不同方法,以及父母在这些决策中的参与度。

方法

对欧洲的一项调查和国家指导文件分析,涉及欧洲的国家新生儿或儿科协会,探索了在妊娠 22 至 25 周完成时出生的婴儿的治疗决策和父母在决策中的参与度。

结果

在联系的 28 个国家中,有 19 个欧洲国家作出了回应。在 25 周时,普遍开始在出生时进行积极治疗。在 24 周时,政策从开始干预(9 个国家)、干预取决于婴儿状况(8 个国家)和复苏限制(2 个国家)。在 23 周及以下,政策从没有积极干预(7 个国家)、个体化决策(8 个国家)、需要父母同意(3 个国家)和普遍开始干预(1 个国家)。父母在政策制定中的参与度以及在 16 个国家中,干预的最终决策权取决于主治医生,这两方面都存在显著差异。

意义

对于在妊娠 22 至 25 周出生后如何进行积极干预,几乎没有共识,而且在许多国家,父母都没有参与政策的制定。在极低的胎龄,欧洲不同的卫生系统之间在出生时进行积极干预的标准或依据存在很大差异。

相似文献

1
European variation in decision-making and parental involvement during preterm birth.欧洲在早产儿分娩过程中的决策和家长参与方面存在差异。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 May;99(3):F245-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305191. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
2
Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods study.优化英格兰妊娠27至31周极早产新生儿服务:OPTI-PREM混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(12):1-126. doi: 10.3310/JYWC6538.
3
Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations.瑞士 22 至 26 孕周之间极早产儿的围产期护理。2011 年瑞士建议修订版。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Oct 18;141:w13280. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13280. eCollection 2011.
4
Management of babies born extremely preterm at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth.孕26周以下极早产儿的管理:出生时的临床实践框架
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 Jan;94(1):F2-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.143321. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
5
Parents' experiences of transition when their infants are discharged from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review protocol.婴儿从新生儿重症监护病房出院时父母的过渡经历:一项系统综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):123-32. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2287.
6
At the threshold of viability: to resuscitate or not to resuscitate - the perspectives of Israeli neonatologists.极早产儿的抢救之争:救还是不救——以色列新生儿科医生的观点。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 May 15;8(1):e002633. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002633.
7
The ethics of neonatal resuscitation at the margins of viability: informed consent and outcomes.极低出生体重儿复苏的伦理学:知情同意与结果
J Pediatr. 2005 Nov;147(5):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.06.002.
8
Factors influencing the care provided for periviable babies in Australia: a narrative review.影响澳大利亚可存活边缘婴儿护理的因素:一项叙述性综述。
Reprod Health. 2015 Nov 25;12:108. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0094-8.
9
Perinatal management of extreme preterm birth before 27 weeks of gestation: a framework for practice.孕27周前极早早产的围产期管理:实践框架
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 May;105(3):232-239. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318402. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Counseling pregnant women who may deliver extremely premature infants: medical care guidelines, family choices, and neonatal outcomes.为可能分娩极早产儿的孕妇提供咨询:医疗护理指南、家庭选择及新生儿结局
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2215.

引用本文的文献

1
Global inequities in the survival of extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.极早产儿生存方面的全球不平等:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05933-w.
2
Healthcare professionals interpersonal variability and determinants of medical decision thresholds for active management of extremely preterm infants in a level 3 perinatal center in France.法国一家三级围产期中心医疗保健专业人员在极早产儿积极管理中的人际差异及医疗决策阈值的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 3;20(4):e0320900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320900. eCollection 2025.
3
Opportunities and Challenges of Prognostic Models for Extremely Preterm Infants.
极早产儿预后模型的机遇与挑战
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 21;10(10):1712. doi: 10.3390/children10101712.
4
Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability.新生儿生存极限护理中的伦理困境
Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;10(5):784. doi: 10.3390/children10050784.
5
Global Policy and Practice for Intrauterine Fetal Resuscitation During Fetal Surgery for Open Spina Bifida Repair.宫内胎儿复苏全球政策与实践:开放性脊柱裂修复术中的胎儿手术
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e239855. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9855.
6
Two-year neurodevelopmental outcome in children born extremely preterm: the EPI-DAF study.极早产儿 2 年神经发育结局:EPI-DAF 研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Sep;107(5):467-474. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323124. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
7
Management and outcomes of extreme preterm birth.极早早产的管理与结局
BMJ. 2022 Jan 10;376:e055924. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-055924.
8
Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing.用于紧急极早产产前咨询的数字决策辅助工具:开发和初步测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01735-z.
9
Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.极早产分娩决策:感知的共享决策、父母决策冲突和决策后悔。
J Perinatol. 2021 Sep;41(9):2201-2207. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01159-7. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Decisions and outcome for infants born near the limit of viability.接近可存活极限出生婴儿的决策与结局
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2021 Jun;8(2):98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Jun 4.