Losvik Ole Kristian, Murad Mudhafar Kareem, Skjerve Eystein, Husum Hans
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromso, PO Box 6050 Langnes, Tromso, 9037, Norway.
Tromso Mine Victim Resource Centre, University Hospital of North Norway, PO Box 80, Tromso, 9038, Norway.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Nov 9;23:94. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0176-1.
Opioid analgesics are used in most trauma systems, and only a few studies report on the use of ketamine for prehospital analgesia. In a low-cost rural trauma system in Iraq paramedics have been using prehospital ketamine analgesia for ten years. This study aims to evaluate the effects of prehospital analgesia on physiologic trauma severity indicators and compare the effect of ketamine and pentazocine on those indicators.
The investigation was conducted as a retrospective cohort study with parallel group design. Three subsamples of trauma patients were compared: no analgesia (n = 275), pentazocine analgesia (n = 888), and ketamine analgesia (n = 713). Physiologic severity scores were calculated based on rated values for respiratory rate, blood pressure, and consciousness. The associations between outcomes and explanatory variables were assessed using a generalized linear model.
Paramedic administration of analgesia was associated with a better physiologic severity score (PSS) outcome (p = 0.01). In the two subsamples receiving analgesia significantly better outcomes were observed for respiration (p < 0.0001) and systolic blood pressure (p < 0.0001). In patients with Injury Severity Score >8 ketamine was associated with a significantly better effect on the systolic blood pressure compared to opioid analgesia (p = 0.03).
Prehospital analgesia for trauma victims improves physiologic severity indicators in a low-resource trauma system. Compared to pentazocine, ketamine was associated with improved blood pressure for patients with serious injuries. In a low-resource setting, ketamine seems to be a good choice for prehospital analgesia in trauma patients.
大多数创伤系统都使用阿片类镇痛药,只有少数研究报道了氯胺酮用于院前镇痛的情况。在伊拉克一个低成本的农村创伤系统中,护理人员使用院前氯胺酮镇痛已有十年。本研究旨在评估院前镇痛对生理创伤严重程度指标的影响,并比较氯胺酮和喷他佐辛对这些指标的影响。
本调查采用回顾性队列研究和平行组设计。比较了三组创伤患者子样本:未镇痛组(n = 275)、喷他佐辛镇痛组(n = 888)和氯胺酮镇痛组(n = 713)。根据呼吸频率、血压和意识的评定值计算生理严重程度评分。使用广义线性模型评估结果与解释变量之间的关联。
护理人员给予镇痛与更好的生理严重程度评分(PSS)结果相关(p = 0.01)。在接受镇痛的两个子样本中,呼吸(p < 0.0001)和收缩压(p < 0.0001)的结果明显更好。在损伤严重程度评分>8的患者中,与阿片类镇痛药相比,氯胺酮对收缩压的影响明显更好(p = 0.03)。
在资源匮乏的创伤系统中,为创伤受害者提供院前镇痛可改善生理严重程度指标。与喷他佐辛相比,氯胺酮对重伤患者的血压有改善作用。在资源匮乏的环境中,氯胺酮似乎是创伤患者院前镇痛的一个不错选择。