Suppr超能文献

干预措施预防职业性噪声聋:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。

Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a Cochrane systematic review.

机构信息

* Cochrane Occupational Safety and Health Review Group, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health , Kuopio , Finland.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S84-96. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.857436.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of interventions for preventing occupational noise exposure or hearing loss compared to no intervention or alternative interventions.

DESIGN

We searched biomedical databases up to 25 January 2012 for randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled before-after studies and interrupted time-series of hearing loss prevention among workers exposed to noise.

STUDY SAMPLE

We included 19 studies with 82 794 participants evaluating effects of hearing loss prevention programs (HLPP). The overall quality of studies was low to very low, as rated using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

One study of stricter legislation showed a favorable effect on noise levels. Three studies, of which two RCTs, did not find an effect of a HLPP. Four studies showed that better use of hearing protection devices in HLPPs decreased the risk of hearing loss. In four other studies, workers in a HLPP still had a 0.5 dB greater hearing loss at 4 kHz (95% CI - 0.5 to 1.7) than non-exposed workers. In two similar studies there was a substantial risk of hearing loss in spite of a HLPP.

CONCLUSIONS

Stricter enforcement of legislation and better implementation of HLPPs can reduce noise levels in workplaces. Better evaluations of technical interventions and long-term effects are needed.

摘要

目的

评估干预措施在预防职业性噪声暴露或听力损失方面的效果,与无干预或替代干预措施相比。

设计

我们检索了生物医学数据库,截至 2012 年 1 月 25 日,寻找针对噪声暴露工人的听力损失预防的随机对照试验(RCT)、对照前后研究和时间序列中断研究。

研究样本

我们纳入了 19 项研究,共 82794 名参与者,评估了听力损失预防计划(HLPP)的效果。使用 GRADE 方法评价,研究的整体质量为低到极低。

结果

一项关于更严格法规的研究显示对噪声水平有有利影响。三项研究,其中两项为 RCT,未发现 HLPP 的效果。四项研究表明,在 HLPP 中更好地使用听力保护装置可降低听力损失的风险。在另外四项研究中,HLPP 中的工人在 4 kHz 时仍有 0.5 dB 的听力损失增加(95%CI-0.5 至 1.7),高于未暴露的工人。在两项类似的研究中,尽管有 HLPP,但仍存在听力损失的高风险。

结论

更严格地执行法规和更好地实施 HLPP 可以降低工作场所的噪声水平。需要更好地评估技术干预措施和长期效果。

相似文献

2
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.
3
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub3.
4
Interventions to prevent occupational noise induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub2.
6
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.促进佩戴听力保护装置的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub2.
8
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.促进佩戴听力保护装置的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub4.
9
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.促进佩戴听力保护装置的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub5.
10
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.促进佩戴听力保护装置的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub3.

引用本文的文献

7
Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?上岗后 6 个月是否有必要进行职业性听力测试?
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88(6):891-895. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Risk assessment of recordable occupational hearing loss in the mining industry.采矿业可记录职业性听力损失的风险评估。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov;58(11):761-768. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1622041. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.促进佩戴听力保护装置的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub5.
10
Effects of shift work on noise-induced hearing loss.轮班工作对噪声性听力损失的影响。
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):185-8. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56210.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验