International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, The University of South Australia, City East Campus, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Feb 26;12:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-10.
There is no standard way of describing the complexities of allied health (AH) care, or its quality. AH is an umbrella term which excludes medicine and nursing, and variably includes disciplines which provide therapy, diagnostic, or scientific services. This paper outlines a framework for a standard approach to evaluate the quality of AH therapy services.
A realist synthesis framework describing what AH does, how it does it, and what is achieved, was developed. This was populated by the findings of a systematic review of literature published since 1980 reporting concepts of quality relevant to AH. Articles were included on quality measurement concepts, theories, debates, and/or hypothetical frameworks.
Of 139 included articles, 21 reported on descriptions of quality potentially relevant to AH. From these, 24 measures of quality were identified, with 15 potentially relating to what AH does, 17 to how AH delivers care, 8 relating to short term functional outcomes, and 9 relating to longer term functional and health system outcomes.
A novel evidence-based quality framework was proposed to address the complexity of AH therapies. This should assist in better evaluation of AH processes and outcomes, costs, and evidence-based engagement of AH providers in healthcare teams.
目前尚无标准方法来描述辅助健康(AH)护理的复杂性或其质量。AH 是一个统称,不包括医学和护理,并且不同地包括提供治疗、诊断或科学服务的学科。本文概述了一种评估 AH 治疗服务质量的标准方法框架。
开发了一个描述 AH 做什么、如何做以及取得什么成果的现实主义综合框架。这是通过对自 1980 年以来发表的有关 AH 相关质量概念的文献进行系统综述的结果来填充的。文章包括质量测量概念、理论、辩论和/或假设框架的报告。
在纳入的 139 篇文章中,有 21 篇报道了与 AH 相关的潜在质量描述。从中确定了 24 项质量衡量标准,其中 15 项可能与 AH 的作用有关,17 项与 AH 提供护理的方式有关,8 项与短期功能结果有关,9 项与长期功能和卫生系统结果有关。
提出了一种新颖的基于证据的质量框架,以解决 AH 疗法的复杂性。这应该有助于更好地评估 AH 的过程和结果、成本,并使 AH 提供者在医疗保健团队中基于证据进行参与。