Lizarondo Lucylynn, Grimmer Karen, Kumar Saravana
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 14;14:572. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0572-7.
Performance evaluation raises several challenges to allied health practitioners and there is no agreed approach to measuring or monitoring allied health service performance. The aim of this review was to examine the literature on performance evaluation in healthcare to assist in the establishment of a framework that can guide the measurement and evaluation of allied health clinical service performance. This review determined the core elements of a performance evaluation system, tools for evaluating performance, and barriers to the implementation of performance evaluation.
A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Five electronic databases were used to search for relevant articles: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Academic Search Premier. Articles which focussed on any allied health performance evaluation or those which examined performance in health care in general were considered in the review. Content analysis was used to synthesise the findings from individual articles.
A total of 37 articles were included in the review. The literature suggests there are core elements involved in performance evaluation which include prioritising clinical areas for measurement, setting goals, selecting performance measures, identifying sources of feedback, undertaking performance measurement, and reporting the results to relevant stakeholders. The literature describes performance evaluation as multi-dimensional, requiring information or data from more than one perspective to provide a rich assessment of performance. A range of tools or instruments are available to capture various perspectives and gather a comprehensive picture of health care quality.
Every allied health care delivery system has different performance needs and will therefore require different approaches. However, there are core processes that can be used as a framework to evaluate allied health performance. A careful examination of barriers to performance evaluation and subsequent tailoring of strategies to overcome these barriers should be undertaken to achieve the aims of performance evaluation. The findings of this review should inform the development of a standardised framework that can be used to measure and evaluate allied health performance. Future research should explore the utility and overall impact of such framework in allied health service delivery.
绩效评估给专职医疗人员带来了诸多挑战,且在衡量或监测专职医疗服务绩效方面尚无统一的方法。本综述的目的是审视医疗保健领域中有关绩效评估的文献,以协助建立一个可指导专职医疗临床服务绩效衡量与评估的框架。本综述确定了绩效评估系统的核心要素、绩效评估工具以及绩效评估实施的障碍。
对文献进行了系统综述。使用了五个电子数据库来搜索相关文章:医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychInfo)和学术搜索大全数据库(Academic Search Premier)。综述纳入了聚焦于任何专职医疗绩效评估的文章,或那些总体上研究医疗保健绩效的文章。采用内容分析法综合各篇文章的研究结果。
本综述共纳入37篇文章。文献表明,绩效评估涉及的核心要素包括确定需衡量的临床领域优先级、设定目标、选择绩效指标、确定反馈来源、进行绩效衡量以及向相关利益相关者报告结果。文献将绩效评估描述为多维度的,需要从多个角度获取信息或数据,以对绩效进行全面评估。有一系列工具或仪器可用于获取不同视角的信息,并全面了解医疗保健质量。
每个专职医疗服务提供系统都有不同的绩效需求,因此需要不同的方法。然而,有一些核心流程可作为评估专职医疗绩效的框架。应仔细审视绩效评估的障碍,并随后针对性地制定克服这些障碍的策略,以实现绩效评估的目标。本综述的结果应为制定可用于衡量和评估专职医疗绩效的标准化框架提供参考。未来的研究应探讨此类框架在专职医疗服务提供中的效用和总体影响。