Pearson Cynthia R, Parker Myra, Fisher Celia B, Moreno Claudia
University of Washington.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Feb;9(1):46-57. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.46.
Current human subject research training modules fail to capture ethically relevant cultural aspects of research involving American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) community members. Applying a Community Engaged Research (CEnR) approach, we adapted the Collaborative IRB Training Initiative training module "assessing risk and benefits." In a two-arm randomized controlled trial, followed by debriefing interviews, we evaluated module acceptability and understandability (test scores) among 40 reservation-based community members. Participants who took the adapted module, compared to those who took the standard module, reported higher scores on relevance of the material overall satisfaction, module quiz scores, and a trend toward higher self-efficacy. Implications of the efficacy of this approach for enhancing ethics training and community participation in research within AI/AN and other cultural populations within and outside the United States are discussed.
当前的人体受试者研究培训模块未能涵盖涉及美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)社区成员的研究在伦理方面的相关文化因素。我们采用社区参与研究(CEnR)方法,对协作机构审查委员会培训倡议的培训模块“评估风险与收益”进行了改编。在一项双臂随机对照试验及后续的汇报访谈中,我们评估了40名居住在保留地的社区成员对该模块的可接受性和可理解性(测试分数)。与采用标准模块的参与者相比,采用改编模块的参与者在材料相关性、总体满意度、模块测验分数以及自我效能感提高趋势方面的得分更高。本文讨论了这种方法对于加强美国境内外AI/AN及其他文化群体的伦理培训和社区参与研究的有效性的意义。