Kue Jennifer, Szalacha Laura A, Happ Mary Beth, Crisp Abigail L, Menon Usha
College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Feb;20(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0548-x.
Non-academic members of research teams, such as community members, can perceive traditional human subjects protection training as lacking in cultural relevance. We present a case exemplar of the development of a human subjects protection training for research staff with limited English proficiency and/or no or limited research experience. Seven modules were adapted for language, cultural examples, etc., from the standard Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) human subjects protection training. Non-academic research staff completed a day-long training in human subjects protection (six modules) and our research protocol (one module). We assessed comprehension of content with PowerPoint slides and module quizzes. All participants successfully passed each module quiz with ≥ 80% correct. Questions answered incorrectly were discussed before proceeding to the next module. To meet the increasing demand for collaborative community-engaged research with underserved minority populations, human subjects protection training protocols can be adapted successfully to reflect real-world situations and provide culturally relevant materials to help non-academic research staff better understand the importance and necessity of research ethics.
研究团队中的非学术成员,如社区成员,可能会认为传统的人类受试者保护培训缺乏文化相关性。我们展示了一个为英语水平有限和/或没有或只有有限研究经验的研究人员开发人类受试者保护培训的案例。从标准的协作机构培训倡议(CITI)人类受试者保护培训中,针对语言、文化示例等改编了七个模块。非学术研究人员完成了为期一天的人类受试者保护培训(六个模块)和我们的研究方案(一个模块)。我们通过PowerPoint幻灯片和模块测验来评估对内容的理解。所有参与者都以≥80%的正确率成功通过了每个模块测验。在进入下一个模块之前,会对回答错误的问题进行讨论。为了满足与服务不足的少数群体进行合作性社区参与研究的日益增长的需求,人类受试者保护培训方案可以成功改编,以反映现实世界的情况,并提供具有文化相关性的材料,帮助非学术研究人员更好地理解研究伦理的重要性和必要性。