• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤和受伤儿童死亡风险预测评分。

Risk prediction score for death of traumatised and injured children.

机构信息

Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Road, Rajathevi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2014 Feb 28;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-60.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-14-60
PMID:24575982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3939810/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injury prediction scores facilitate the development of clinical management protocols to decrease mortality. However, most of the previously developed scores are limited in scope and are non-specific for use in children. We aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model of death for injured and Traumatised Thai children.

METHODS

Our cross-sectional study included 43,516 injured children from 34 emergency services. A risk prediction model was derived using a logistic regression analysis that included 15 predictors. Model performance was assessed using the concordance statistic (C-statistic) and the observed per expected (O/E) ratio. Internal validation of the model was performed using a 200-repetition bootstrap analysis.

RESULTS

Death occurred in 1.7% of the injured children (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.57-1.82). Ten predictors (i.e., age, airway intervention, physical injury mechanism, three injured body regions, the Glasgow Coma Scale, and three vital signs) were significantly associated with death. The C-statistic and the O/E ratio were 0.938 (95% CI: 0.929-0.947) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.70-1.02), respectively. The scoring scheme classified three risk stratifications with respective likelihood ratios of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.25-1.27), 2.45 (95% CI: 2.42-2.52), and 4.72 (95% CI: 4.57-4.88) for low, intermediate, and high risks of death. Internal validation showed good model performance (C-statistic = 0.938, 95% CI: 0.926-0.952) and a small calibration bias of 0.002 (95% CI: 0.0005-0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a simplified Thai pediatric injury death prediction score with satisfactory calibrated and discriminative performance in emergency room settings.

摘要

背景

伤害预测评分有助于制定临床管理方案以降低死亡率。然而,以前开发的大多数评分范围有限,并且不适用于儿童。我们旨在开发和验证一种用于受伤和创伤泰国儿童死亡风险的预测模型。

方法

我们的横断面研究包括来自 34 个急救服务的 43516 名受伤儿童。使用逻辑回归分析得出风险预测模型,该模型包含 15 个预测因子。使用一致性统计量(C 统计量)和观察到的预期比(O/E 比)评估模型性能。使用 200 次重复自举分析对模型进行内部验证。

结果

受伤儿童中有 1.7%(95%置信区间 [95%CI]:1.57-1.82)死亡。10 个预测因子(即年龄、气道干预、物理损伤机制、三个受伤身体部位、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和三个生命体征)与死亡显着相关。C 统计量和 O/E 比分别为 0.938(95%CI:0.929-0.947)和 0.86(95%CI:0.70-1.02)。评分方案将三种风险分层分类,相应的似然比分别为 1.26(95%CI:1.25-1.27)、2.45(95%CI:2.42-2.52)和 4.72(95%CI:4.57-4.88),用于低、中、高死亡风险。内部验证显示模型性能良好(C 统计量=0.938,95%CI:0.926-0.952),校准偏差较小为 0.002(95%CI:0.0005-0.003)。

结论

我们开发了一种简化的泰国儿科伤害死亡预测评分,在急诊环境中具有令人满意的校准和区分性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63cc/3939810/cf1dc1b77bbe/1471-2431-14-60-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63cc/3939810/cf1dc1b77bbe/1471-2431-14-60-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63cc/3939810/cf1dc1b77bbe/1471-2431-14-60-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk prediction score for death of traumatised and injured children.创伤和受伤儿童死亡风险预测评分。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Feb 28;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-60.
2
Development and validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model for Thai women: a cross-sectional study.泰国女性乳腺癌风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项横断面研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(16):6811-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.16.6811.
3
Direct to operating room trauma resuscitation decreases mortality among severely injured children.直接送往手术室进行创伤复苏可降低严重受伤儿童的死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Oct;85(4):659-664. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001908.
4
Pediatric adjusted reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale as a prospective predictor for mortality in pediatric trauma.儿科校正反转休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为儿科创伤死亡率的前瞻性预测指标。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jan 1;90(1):21-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002946.
5
Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.挪威创伤生存预测模型:解剖损伤、急性生理学、年龄及合并症的建模效应
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Mar;58(3):303-15. doi: 10.1111/aas.12256. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
6
Predicting in-hospital death among patients injured in traffic crashes in Saudi Arabia.预测沙特阿拉伯交通事故受伤患者的院内死亡情况。
Injury. 2014 Nov;45(11):1693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
Trauma models to identify major trauma and mortality in the prehospital setting.创伤模型在院前环境中识别重大创伤和死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):373-380. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11304. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area.一种作为创伤患者生存预测模型的人工神经网络:区域创伤地区的验证
J Trauma. 2000 Aug;49(2):212-20; discussion 220-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200008000-00006.
9
Is the Kampala trauma score an effective predictor of mortality in low-resource settings? A comparison of multiple trauma severity scores.坎帕拉创伤评分在资源匮乏地区是死亡率的有效预测指标吗?多种创伤严重程度评分的比较。
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):1905-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2496-0.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram based on trauma-induced coagulopathy for predicting hospital mortality in multi-trauma patients: a retrospective study.基于创伤性凝血病预测多发伤患者医院死亡率的列线图:一项回顾性研究
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03867-w.
2
The Preschool-Aged and School-Aged Children Present Different Odds of Mortality than Adults in Southern Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Analysis.台湾南部学龄前和学龄儿童的死亡率与成年人不同:一项横断面回顾性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 25;15(5):858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050858.
3
Timing of mortality in pediatric trauma patients: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive value of initial Glasgow coma scale score in pediatric trauma patients.小儿创伤患者初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的预测价值
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b52bf.
2
GBD 2010: understanding disease, injury, and risk.《2010年全球疾病负担研究:了解疾病、伤害及风险》
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2053-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62133-3.
3
Prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury: concepts and ongoing controversies.创伤性脑损伤的院前管理:概念与持续争议
小儿创伤患者的死亡时间:一项国家创伤数据库分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
4
Pediatric trauma BIG score: Predicting mortality in polytraumatized pediatric patients.小儿创伤BIG评分:预测多发伤小儿患者的死亡率。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;20(11):640-646. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.194011.
5
Systematic review and need assessment of pediatric trauma outcome benchmarking tools for low-resource settings.低资源环境下儿科创伤结局基准工具的系统评价与需求评估
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Mar;33(3):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-4024-9. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Oct;25(5):556-62. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328357225c.
4
Vital signs: Unintentional injury deaths among persons aged 0-19 years - United States, 2000-2009.生命体征:2000-2009 年美国 0-19 岁人群非故意伤害死亡情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Apr 20;61:270-6.
5
Universally poor outcomes of pediatric traumatic arrest: a prospective case series and review of the literature.儿童创伤性心脏骤停普遍预后不良:一项前瞻性病例系列研究及文献综述
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Jul;27(7):616-21. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31822255c9.
6
The counterintuitive effect of multiple injuries in severity scoring: a simple variable improves the predictive ability of NISS.多发伤严重程度评分中的反直觉效应:一个简单变量可提高 NISS 的预测能力。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Apr 19;19:26. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-26.
7
Factors associated with clinically significant head injury in children involved in motor vehicle crashes.与机动车事故中涉及的儿童临床显著头部损伤相关的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Dec;11(6):600-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2010.513072.
8
Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第13部分:儿科基础生命支持:2010年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S862-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971085.
9
The use of Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) at Siriraj Hospital: how accurate is it?诗里拉吉医院创伤评分-损伤严重度评分(TRISS)的应用:其准确性如何?
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Aug;92(8):1016-21.
10
Injury prevention and the attainment of child and adolescent health.伤害预防与儿童及青少年健康的实现。
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 May;87(5):390-4. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.059808.