Henningsson Per, Hedenström Anders, Bomphrey Richard J
Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Structure & Motion Lab, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090170. eCollection 2014.
Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding flight, the wing experiences uniform incident flow and the optimal shape is a high aspect ratio wing with an elliptical planform. In flapping flight, on the other hand, the wing tip travels faster than the root, creating a spanwise velocity gradient. To compensate, the optimal wing shape should taper towards the tip (reducing the local chord) and/or twist from root to tip (reducing local angle of attack). We hypothesised that, if a bird is limited in its ability to morph its wings and adapt its wing shape to suit both flight modes, then a preference towards flapping flight optimization will be expected since this is the most energetically demanding flight mode. We tested this by studying a well-known flap-gliding species, the common swift, by measuring the wakes generated by two birds, one in gliding and one in flapping flight in a wind tunnel. We calculated span efficiency, the efficiency of lift production, and found that the flapping swift had consistently higher span efficiency than the gliding swift. This supports our hypothesis and suggests that even though swifts have been shown previously to increase their lift-to-drag ratio substantially when gliding, the wing morphology is tuned to be more aerodynamically efficient in generating lift during flapping. Since body drag can be assumed to be similar for both flapping and gliding, it follows that the higher total drag in flapping flight compared with gliding flight is primarily a consequence of an increase in wing profile drag due to the flapping motion, exceeding the reduction in induced drag.
许多飞行生物在日常行为中既会采用扑翼飞行,也会采用滑翔飞行。这两种运动模式对机翼设计在空气动力学效率方面提出了相互矛盾的要求,并且在没有极端变形的情况下,机翼无法针对两种飞行模式都实现优化。在滑翔飞行中,机翼经历均匀的入射气流,最佳形状是具有椭圆形平面形状的大展弦比机翼。另一方面,在扑翼飞行中,翼尖的移动速度比翼根快,从而产生展向速度梯度。为了补偿这一点,最佳机翼形状应该朝着翼尖逐渐变细(减小局部弦长)和/或从翼根到翼尖扭转(减小局部迎角)。我们假设,如果鸟类改变其翅膀形状并使其适应两种飞行模式的能力有限,那么可以预期它们会倾向于优化扑翼飞行,因为这是能量需求最高的飞行模式。我们通过研究一种著名的扑翼 - 滑翔物种——普通雨燕来验证这一假设,在风洞中测量了两只雨燕产生的尾流,一只处于滑翔状态,另一只处于扑翼飞行状态。我们计算了展向效率,即升力产生的效率,发现扑翼飞行的雨燕展向效率始终高于滑翔的雨燕。这支持了我们的假设,并表明尽管之前已经证明雨燕在滑翔时能够大幅提高其升阻比,但它们的翅膀形态在扑翼过程中产生升力时在空气动力学上更高效。由于可以假设扑翼和滑翔时的机身阻力相似,因此扑翼飞行中与滑翔飞行相比总阻力更高,主要是由于扑翼运动导致机翼剖面阻力增加,超过了诱导阻力的减小。