• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

攻防敏捷性:下肢运动学和地面反作用力的性别比较

Offensive and defensive agility: a sex comparison of lower body kinematics and ground reaction forces.

作者信息

Spiteri Tania, Hart Nicolas H, Nimphius Sophia

机构信息

School of Exercise and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.

出版信息

J Appl Biomech. 2014 Aug;30(4):514-20. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0259. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1123/jab.2013-0259
PMID:24615296
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical and perceptual-cognitive variables between sexes during an offensive and defensive agility protocol. Twelve male and female (n = 24) recreational team sport athletes participated in this study, each performing 12 offensive and defensive agility trials (6 left, 6 right) changing direction in response to movements of a human stimulus. Three-dimensional motion, ground reaction force (GRF), and impulse data were recorded across plant phase for dominant leg change of direction (COD) movements, while timing gates and high-speed video captured decision time, total running time, and post COD stride velocity. Subjects also performed a unilateral isometric squat to determine lower body strength and limb dominance. Group (sex) by condition (2 × 2) MANOVAs with follow-up ANOVAs were conducted to examine differences between groups (P ≤ .05). Male athletes demonstrated significantly greater lower body strength, vertical braking force and impulse application, knee and spine flexion, and hip abduction, as well as faster decision time and post COD stride velocity during both agility conditions compared with females. Differences between offensive and defensive movements appear to be attributed to differences in decision time between sexes. This study demonstrates that biomechanical and perceptual-cognitive differences exist between sexes and within offensive and defensive agility movements.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在攻防敏捷性测试中男女之间的生物力学和感知认知变量。12名男性和12名女性(n = 24)参加娱乐性团队运动的运动员参与了本研究,每人进行12次攻防敏捷性测试(6次向左,6次向右),根据人类刺激的动作改变方向。记录了主导腿变向(COD)动作支撑阶段的三维运动、地面反作用力(GRF)和冲量数据,同时计时门和高速摄像机记录了决策时间、总跑步时间以及COD后步幅速度。受试者还进行了单侧等长蹲以确定下肢力量和肢体优势。进行了组(性别)×条件(2×2)多因素方差分析及后续方差分析以检验组间差异(P≤0.05)。与女性相比,男性运动员在两种敏捷性测试条件下均表现出明显更强的下肢力量、垂直制动力和冲量施加、膝关节和脊柱屈曲以及髋关节外展,以及更快的决策时间和COD后步幅速度。攻防动作之间的差异似乎归因于男女之间决策时间的差异。本研究表明,男女之间以及攻防敏捷性动作内部存在生物力学和感知认知差异。

相似文献

1
Offensive and defensive agility: a sex comparison of lower body kinematics and ground reaction forces.攻防敏捷性:下肢运动学和地面反作用力的性别比较
J Appl Biomech. 2014 Aug;30(4):514-20. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0259. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
2
Effect of strength on plant foot kinetics and kinematics during a change of direction task.力量对变向任务中植物脚动力学和运动学的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(6):646-52. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.774053. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
3
Mechanical Determinants of Faster Change of Direction and Agility Performance in Female Basketball Athletes.女子篮球运动员更快变向和敏捷性表现的力学决定因素
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):2205-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000876.
4
Physical Determinants of Division 1 Collegiate Basketball, Women's National Basketball League, and Women's National Basketball Association Athletes: With Reference to Lower-Body Sidedness.女子一级大学篮球、女子国家篮球联赛和女子国家篮球协会运动员的身体决定因素:以下肢偏侧性为参考。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan;33(1):159-166. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001905.
5
Comparison of offensive agility techniques in Australian Rules football.澳式足球中进攻敏捷技术的比较。
J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jan;14(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 25.
6
Biomechanical Determinants of the Modified and Traditional 505 Change of Direction Speed Test.改良和传统 505 变向速度测试的生物力学决定因素。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1285-1296. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003439.
7
Influence of closed skill and open skill warm-ups on the performance of speed, change of direction speed, vertical jump, and reactive agility in team sport athletes.封闭技能和开放技能热身对团队运动运动员速度、变向速度、垂直跳跃和反应敏捷性表现的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1413-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181739ecd.
8
Neuromuscular performance of Bandal Chagui: Comparison of subelite and elite taekwondo athletes.班达尔·查吉的神经肌肉表现:次精英和精英跆拳道运动员的比较。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Oct;30:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Sport-Specific Conditioning Variables Predict Offensive and Defensive Performance in High-Level Youth Water Polo Athletes.特定运动的训练变量可预测高水平青少年水球运动员的进攻和防守表现。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1316-24. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001213.
10
A hierarchical model of factors influencing a battery of agility tests.影响一系列敏捷性测试的因素的层次模型。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 Nov;55(11):1329-35. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical Determinants of Change of Direction Performance: A Systematic Review.变向能力改变的生物力学决定因素:一项系统综述
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02278-3.
2
Anticipatory effects on side-step cutting biomechanics in Women's Australian Football League players.对澳大利亚女子足球联赛球员侧步切入生物力学的预期影响。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Jun 14;9(2):e001587. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001587. eCollection 2023.
3
Reactive Agility in Competitive Young Volleyball Players: A Gender Comparison of Perceptual-Cognitive and Motor Determinants.
竞技青年排球运动员的反应敏捷性:感知认知和运动决定因素的性别比较
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 4;85:87-96. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0112. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
The influence of short sprint performance, acceleration, and deceleration mechanical properties on change of direction ability in soccer players-A cross-sectional study.短跑成绩、加速和减速力学特性对足球运动员变向能力的影响——一项横断面研究
Front Physiol. 2022 Nov 2;13:1027811. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1027811. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and trainability of agility in youth: A systematic scoping review.青少年敏捷性的发展与可训练性:一项系统的范围综述。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Sep 8;4:952779. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.952779. eCollection 2022.
6
The Effect of High-Intensity Accelerations and Decelerations on Match Outcome of an Elite English League Two Football Team.高强度加减速对英超联赛二线精英足球队比赛结果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;18(18):9913. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189913.
7
Influence of Feet Position and Execution Velocity on Muscle Activation and Kinematic Parameters During the Inclined Leg Press Exercise.倾斜腿推蹬练习中足部位置和执行速度对肌肉激活和运动学参数的影响。
Sports Health. 2022 May-Jun;14(3):317-327. doi: 10.1177/19417381211016357. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Returning to Play after Prolonged Training Restrictions in Professional Collision Sports.重返职业碰撞运动:长期训练限制后。
Int J Sports Med. 2020 Oct;41(13):895-911. doi: 10.1055/a-1180-3692. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Core Stability and Athletic Performance in Male and Female Lacrosse Players.男女长曲棍球运动员的核心稳定性与运动表现
Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 Nov 1;12(4):1138-1148. doi: 10.70252/BCTX2769. eCollection 2019.
10
Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Activity during an Isometric Squat between Strength-Matched Men and Women.男女力量匹配者进行等长深蹲时股四头肌和腘绳肌活动的比较。
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Feb 11;18(1):101-108. eCollection 2019 Mar.