Spiteri Tania, Hart Nicolas H, Nimphius Sophia
School of Exercise and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
J Appl Biomech. 2014 Aug;30(4):514-20. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0259. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical and perceptual-cognitive variables between sexes during an offensive and defensive agility protocol. Twelve male and female (n = 24) recreational team sport athletes participated in this study, each performing 12 offensive and defensive agility trials (6 left, 6 right) changing direction in response to movements of a human stimulus. Three-dimensional motion, ground reaction force (GRF), and impulse data were recorded across plant phase for dominant leg change of direction (COD) movements, while timing gates and high-speed video captured decision time, total running time, and post COD stride velocity. Subjects also performed a unilateral isometric squat to determine lower body strength and limb dominance. Group (sex) by condition (2 × 2) MANOVAs with follow-up ANOVAs were conducted to examine differences between groups (P ≤ .05). Male athletes demonstrated significantly greater lower body strength, vertical braking force and impulse application, knee and spine flexion, and hip abduction, as well as faster decision time and post COD stride velocity during both agility conditions compared with females. Differences between offensive and defensive movements appear to be attributed to differences in decision time between sexes. This study demonstrates that biomechanical and perceptual-cognitive differences exist between sexes and within offensive and defensive agility movements.
本研究的目的是比较在攻防敏捷性测试中男女之间的生物力学和感知认知变量。12名男性和12名女性(n = 24)参加娱乐性团队运动的运动员参与了本研究,每人进行12次攻防敏捷性测试(6次向左,6次向右),根据人类刺激的动作改变方向。记录了主导腿变向(COD)动作支撑阶段的三维运动、地面反作用力(GRF)和冲量数据,同时计时门和高速摄像机记录了决策时间、总跑步时间以及COD后步幅速度。受试者还进行了单侧等长蹲以确定下肢力量和肢体优势。进行了组(性别)×条件(2×2)多因素方差分析及后续方差分析以检验组间差异(P≤0.05)。与女性相比,男性运动员在两种敏捷性测试条件下均表现出明显更强的下肢力量、垂直制动力和冲量施加、膝关节和脊柱屈曲以及髋关节外展,以及更快的决策时间和COD后步幅速度。攻防动作之间的差异似乎归因于男女之间决策时间的差异。本研究表明,男女之间以及攻防敏捷性动作内部存在生物力学和感知认知差异。