文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

肩峰下疼痛综合征患者中挪威版上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH)的反应度及最小重要变化

Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

作者信息

Rysstad Tarjei, Røe Yngve, Haldorsen Benjamin, Svege Ida, Strand Liv Inger

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Postboks 4, St Olavs Plass, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Physiotherapy, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 8;18(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1616-z.


DOI:10.1186/s12891-017-1616-z
PMID:28595612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5465524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). It was designed to measure physical disability and symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity, and is one of the most commonly used PROMs for patients with shoulder pain. The aim of this study was to examine responsiveness, the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of the DASH, in line with international (COSMIN) recommendations. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 50 patients with subacromial pain syndrome, undergoing physical therapy for 3-4 months. Responsiveness to change was examined by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and testing a priori-formulated hypothesis regarding correlations with changes in other instruments that measuring the same construct. The SDC was calculated using a test re-test protocol, and the MIC was calculated by the anchor-based MIC distribution. MIC values for patients with low and high baseline scores were also calculated. RESULTS: DASH appeared to be responsive, as it was able to distinguish patients who reported to be improved from those unchanged (AUC 0.77). All of the hypotheses were accepted. The SDC was 11.8, and the MIC was 4.4. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Norwegian version of the DASH has good responsiveness to change and may thus be recommended to measure outcome in patients with shoulder pain in Norway.

摘要

背景:上肢功能障碍、肩部与手部问卷(DASH)是一种有效且可靠的患者报告结局指标(PROM)。它旨在测量上肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的身体残疾和症状,是肩部疼痛患者最常用的PROM之一。本研究的目的是根据国际(COSMIN)建议,检验DASH的反应度、最小可检测变化(SDC)和最小重要变化(MIC)。 方法:研究样本包括50例患有肩峰下疼痛综合征且接受3 - 4个月物理治疗的患者。通过计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)并检验关于与测量相同结构的其他工具变化的相关性的先验假设,来检验对变化的反应度。使用重测协议计算SDC,并通过基于锚定的MIC分布计算MIC。还计算了基线分数低和高的患者的MIC值。 结果:DASH似乎具有反应度,因为它能够区分报告病情改善的患者和未改善的患者(AUC为0.77)。所有假设均被接受。SDC为11.8,MIC为4.4。 结论:本研究表明,挪威版DASH对变化具有良好的反应度,因此可能推荐用于测量挪威肩部疼痛患者的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/35328e8515ec/12891_2017_1616_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/098533ef29f8/12891_2017_1616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/c5c7ccaef7ee/12891_2017_1616_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/35328e8515ec/12891_2017_1616_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/098533ef29f8/12891_2017_1616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/c5c7ccaef7ee/12891_2017_1616_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41e/5465524/35328e8515ec/12891_2017_1616_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017-6-8

[2]
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014-3-12

[3]
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

J Orthop Surg Res. 2013-11-14

[4]
Responsiveness of two Persian-versions of shoulder outcome measures following physiotherapy intervention in patients with shoulder disorders.

Disabil Rehabil. 2015

[5]
Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with shoulder pain.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019-3-21

[6]
Responsiveness and minimal important change of the QuickDASH and PSFS when used among patients with shoulder pain.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-5-27

[7]
Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and minimal important change of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Constant-Murley scores in patients with a humeral shaft fracture.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017-1

[8]
The Responsiveness and Interpretability of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017-4

[9]
Responsiveness and minimal important change for the quick-DASH in patients with shoulder disorders.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018-12-10

[10]
Is the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009-2-15

引用本文的文献

[1]
Minimal important change of the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025-2-15

[2]
Responsiveness of monopodal postural stability tests in recreational athletes.

PeerJ. 2024

[3]
Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Arabic Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) in Patients with Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Healthcare (Basel). 2023-9-26

[4]
Responsiveness of Persian 12-Item multiple sclerosis walking scale: a replication study.

BMC Res Notes. 2023-4-4

[5]
Determining minimal important differences for patient-reported outcome measures in shoulder, lateral elbow, patellar and Achilles tendinopathies using distribution-based methods.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023-3-2

[6]
Function, strength, and muscle activation of the shoulder complex in Crossfit practitioners with and without pain: a cross-sectional observational study.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022-1-15

[7]
The minimal important change for the seven-item disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH 7) questionnaire - Assessing shoulder function in patients with subacromial pain.

JSES Int. 2021-3-23

[8]
Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021-2

[9]
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a Rapid Recommendation.

BMJ Open. 2019-2-20

[10]
Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019-1-17

本文引用的文献

[1]
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.

Braz J Phys Ther. 2016-1-19

[2]
Global ratings of change do not accurately reflect functional change over time in clinical practice.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015-2

[3]
Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014-11-26

[4]
Validity of the QuickDASH in patients with shoulder-related disorders undergoing surgery.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015-1

[5]
Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain syndrome: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association.

Acta Orthop. 2014-5-21

[6]
Responsiveness of a Danish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

Dan Med J. 2014-4

[7]
The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014-4-15

[8]
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014-3-12

[9]
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

J Orthop Surg Res. 2013-11-14

[10]
Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH).

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013-10-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索