• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多民族人群中分割剂量与单剂量制剂的耐受性:副作用减少但社会障碍增加

Split- versus single-dose preparation tolerability in a multiethnic population: decreased side effects but greater social barriers.

作者信息

Perreault Gabriel, Goodman Adam, Larion Sebastian, Sen Ahana, Quiles Kirsten, Poles Michael, Williams Renee

机构信息

Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York (GabrielPerrault), USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, New York University School of Medicine, New York (Adam Goodman, Kirsten Quiles, Renee Williams), USA.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):356-364. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0254. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

DOI:10.20524/aog.2018.0254
PMID:29720862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5924859/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to compare patient-reported tolerability and its barriers in single- vs. split-dose 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation for colonoscopy in a large multiethnic, safety-net patient population.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, dual-center study using a multi-language survey was used to collect patient-reported demographic, medical, socioeconomic, and tolerability data from patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify demographic and clinical factors significantly associated with patient-reported bowel preparation tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 1023 complete surveys were included, of which 342 (33.4%) completed single-dose and 681 (66.6%) split-dose bowel preparation. Thirty-nine percent of the patients were Hispanic, 50% had Medicaid or no insurance, and 34% had limited English proficiency. Patients who underwent split-dose preparation were significantly more likely to report a tolerable preparation, with less severe symptoms, than were patients who underwent single-dose preparation. Multiple logistic regression revealed that male sex and instructions in the preferred language were associated with tolerability of the single-dose preparation, while male sex and concerns about medications were associated with tolerability of the split-dose preparation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large multiethnic safety-net population, split-dose bowel preparation was significantly more tolerable and associated with less severe gastrointestinal symptoms than single-dose preparation. The tolerability of split-dose bowel preparation was associated with social barriers, including concerns about interfering with other medications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较在一个大型多民族安全网患者群体中,患者报告的单剂量与分剂量4升聚乙二醇(PEG)用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的耐受性及其障碍。

方法

采用多语言调查问卷的横断面双中心研究,收集接受门诊结肠镜检查患者报告的人口统计学、医学、社会经济和耐受性数据。采用单因素和多因素分析来确定与患者报告的肠道准备耐受性显著相关的人口统计学和临床因素。

结果

共纳入1023份完整调查问卷,其中342例(33.4%)完成单剂量肠道准备,681例(66.6%)完成分剂量肠道准备。39%的患者为西班牙裔,50%有医疗补助或无保险,34%英语水平有限。与接受单剂量准备的患者相比,接受分剂量准备的患者更有可能报告可耐受的准备过程,症状较轻。多元逻辑回归显示,男性和使用首选语言的说明与单剂量准备的耐受性相关,而男性和对药物的担忧与分剂量准备的耐受性相关。

结论

在一个大型多民族安全网人群中,分剂量肠道准备比单剂量准备明显更易耐受,且胃肠道症状较轻。分剂量肠道准备的耐受性与社会障碍有关,包括对干扰其他药物的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2f/5924859/e27fa139f8ab/AnnGastroenterol-31-356-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2f/5924859/1f1edc0e882a/AnnGastroenterol-31-356-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2f/5924859/e27fa139f8ab/AnnGastroenterol-31-356-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2f/5924859/1f1edc0e882a/AnnGastroenterol-31-356-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2f/5924859/e27fa139f8ab/AnnGastroenterol-31-356-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Split- versus single-dose preparation tolerability in a multiethnic population: decreased side effects but greater social barriers.多民族人群中分割剂量与单剂量制剂的耐受性:副作用减少但社会障碍增加
Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):356-364. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0254. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
2
Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study.同日和分剂量使用 4 升聚乙二醇的肠道准备的肠道清洁效果、安全性、肠道运动动力学和患者耐受性比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Dec;62(12):1518-1527. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001499.
3
Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy.分剂量与当日减量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液用于上午结肠镜检查的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14488-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488.
4
Morning-only polyethylene glycol is noninferior but less preferred by hospitalized patients as compared with split-dose bowel preparation.仅在早晨服用的聚乙二醇与分剂量肠道准备相比,效果不劣,但住院患者对此的偏好较低。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 May-Jun;48(5):414-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829f30e9.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study.高容量与低容量肠道准备的疗效和耐受性比较:一项真实单盲大样本研究
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):659-672. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659.
6
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Split dose bowel preparation before colonoscopy of PEG (Nulytely) in comparison to routine single dose bowel preparation.PEG(Nulytely)结肠镜检查前的分剂量肠道准备与常规单剂量肠道准备的比较。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul-Aug;27(4):234-239. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_563_20.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of low-volume (2 L) versus single- (4 L) versus split-dose (2 L + 2 L) polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized clinical trial.低容量(2 升)与单次(4 升)和分剂量(2 升+2 升)聚乙二醇肠道准备用于结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性:随机临床试验。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Nov;26(6):731-6. doi: 10.1111/den.12265. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
9
Randomized Controlled Trial: Split-dose and Same-day Large Volume Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy Have Similar Quality of Preparation.随机对照试验:下午结肠镜检查的分剂量和同日大剂量肠道准备具有相似的准备质量。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):724-730. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001213.
10
Single-dose lubiprostone along with split-dose PEG solution without dietary restrictions for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.单剂量鲁比前列酮联合分剂量聚乙二醇溶液用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备且无饮食限制:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep;103(9):2224-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02053.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Split dose bowel preparation before colonoscopy of PEG (Nulytely) in comparison to routine single dose bowel preparation.PEG(Nulytely)结肠镜检查前的分剂量肠道准备与常规单剂量肠道准备的比较。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul-Aug;27(4):234-239. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_563_20.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Commercial Bowel Preparations in Ambulatory Patients Presenting for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy.商业用肠道准备制剂在门诊患者行筛查或监测结肠镜检查中的比较效果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jun;66(6):2059-2068. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06492-z. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Effectiveness of concomitant use of green tea and polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
2
Barriers against split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中分次肠道准备的障碍。
Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1428-1433. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311049. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
How We Cleaned It Up: A Simple Method That Improved Our Practice's Bowel Prep.我们是如何清理它的:一种改进我们诊所肠道准备工作的简单方法。
绿茶和聚乙二醇联合应用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的效果:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 May 13;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01220-3.
4
Comparison of the effect of 1-day and 2-day low residue diets on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy.对比结肠镜检查前 1 天和 2 天低渣饮食对肠道准备质量的影响。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 May-Jun;26(3):137-143. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_471_19.
5
Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?在结肠镜筛查准备过程中,一日分剂量聚乙二醇清液饮食能否打破传统的做法模式?
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;30(9):817-825. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.19071.
6
Split-dose bowel preparation versus water exchange and adenoma detection rate: have we arrived there yet?分剂量肠道准备与水交换及腺瘤检出率:我们达到目标了吗?
Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):253-255. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0257. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;111(8):1079-81. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.148. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.分剂量准备用于结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率:一项在有组织筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):270-277. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Split-Dose Preparations Are Superior to Day-Before Bowel Cleansing Regimens: A Meta-analysis.分剂量制剂优于前一天肠道准备方案:一项荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):79-88. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Quality measures and quality improvements in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中的质量指标与质量改进
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;31(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000140.
7
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.优化结肠镜检查肠道准备的充分性:美国结直肠癌多学会工作组的建议
Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002.
8
Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies.结肠镜检查的最佳肠道准备:分剂量给药!一系列对照研究的荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):566-576.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.320. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
9
Development and validation of the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire.梅奥诊所肠道准备耐受性问卷的开发与验证
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Sep;46(9):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Patient tolerability of bowel preparation is associated with polyp detection rate during colonoscopy.肠道准备的患者耐受性与结肠镜检查期间的息肉检出率相关。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):135-40. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.ewh1.