Perreault Gabriel, Goodman Adam, Larion Sebastian, Sen Ahana, Quiles Kirsten, Poles Michael, Williams Renee
Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York (GabrielPerrault), USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, New York University School of Medicine, New York (Adam Goodman, Kirsten Quiles, Renee Williams), USA.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):356-364. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0254. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
This study was performed to compare patient-reported tolerability and its barriers in single- vs. split-dose 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation for colonoscopy in a large multiethnic, safety-net patient population.
A cross-sectional, dual-center study using a multi-language survey was used to collect patient-reported demographic, medical, socioeconomic, and tolerability data from patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify demographic and clinical factors significantly associated with patient-reported bowel preparation tolerability.
A total of 1023 complete surveys were included, of which 342 (33.4%) completed single-dose and 681 (66.6%) split-dose bowel preparation. Thirty-nine percent of the patients were Hispanic, 50% had Medicaid or no insurance, and 34% had limited English proficiency. Patients who underwent split-dose preparation were significantly more likely to report a tolerable preparation, with less severe symptoms, than were patients who underwent single-dose preparation. Multiple logistic regression revealed that male sex and instructions in the preferred language were associated with tolerability of the single-dose preparation, while male sex and concerns about medications were associated with tolerability of the split-dose preparation.
In a large multiethnic safety-net population, split-dose bowel preparation was significantly more tolerable and associated with less severe gastrointestinal symptoms than single-dose preparation. The tolerability of split-dose bowel preparation was associated with social barriers, including concerns about interfering with other medications.
本研究旨在比较在一个大型多民族安全网患者群体中,患者报告的单剂量与分剂量4升聚乙二醇(PEG)用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的耐受性及其障碍。
采用多语言调查问卷的横断面双中心研究,收集接受门诊结肠镜检查患者报告的人口统计学、医学、社会经济和耐受性数据。采用单因素和多因素分析来确定与患者报告的肠道准备耐受性显著相关的人口统计学和临床因素。
共纳入1023份完整调查问卷,其中342例(33.4%)完成单剂量肠道准备,681例(66.6%)完成分剂量肠道准备。39%的患者为西班牙裔,50%有医疗补助或无保险,34%英语水平有限。与接受单剂量准备的患者相比,接受分剂量准备的患者更有可能报告可耐受的准备过程,症状较轻。多元逻辑回归显示,男性和使用首选语言的说明与单剂量准备的耐受性相关,而男性和对药物的担忧与分剂量准备的耐受性相关。
在一个大型多民族安全网人群中,分剂量肠道准备比单剂量准备明显更易耐受,且胃肠道症状较轻。分剂量肠道准备的耐受性与社会障碍有关,包括对干扰其他药物的担忧。