Escoffery Cam, Rodgers Kirsten C, Kegler Michelle C, Haardörfer Regine, Howard David H, Liang Shuting, Pinsker Erika, Roland Katherine B, Allen Jennifer D, Ory Marcia G, Bastani Roshan, Fernandez Maria E, Risendal Betsy C, Byrd Theresa L, Coronado Gloria D
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 24;14:274. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-274.
Special events are common community-based strategies for health promotion. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review on the impact of special events to promote breast, cervical or colorectal cancer education and screening.
Articles in English that focused on special events involving breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer conducted in the U.S. and published between January 1990 and December 2011 were identified from seven databases: Ovid, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstract, Cochrane Libraries, and EconLit. Study inclusion and data extraction were independently validated by two researchers.
Of the 20 articles selected for screening out of 1,409, ten articles on special events reported outcome data. Five types of special events were found: health fairs, parties, cultural events, special days, and plays. Many focused on breast cancer only, or in combination with other cancers. Reach ranged from 50-1732 participants. All special events used at least one evidence-based strategy suggested by the Community Guide to Preventive Services, such as small media, one-on-one education, and reducing structural barriers. For cancer screening as an outcome of the events, mammography screening rates ranged from 4.8% to 88%, Pap testing was 3.9%, and clinical breast exams ranged from 9.1% to 100%. For colorectal screening, FOBT ranged from 29.4% to 76%, and sigmoidoscopy was 100% at one event. Outcome measures included intentions to get screened, scheduled appointments, uptake of clinical exams, and participation in cancer screening.
Special events found in the review varied and used evidence-based strategies. Screening data suggest that some special events can lead to increases in cancer screening, especially if they provide onsite screening services. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that special events are effective in increasing cancer screening. The heterogeneity of populations served, event activities, outcome variables assessed, and the reliance on self-report to measure screening limit conclusions. This study highlights the need for further research to determine the effectiveness of special events to increase cancer screening.
特殊活动是常见的基于社区的健康促进策略。本文呈现了一项关于特殊活动对促进乳腺癌、宫颈癌或结直肠癌教育与筛查影响的系统文献综述结果。
从七个数据库(Ovid、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、心理学文摘数据库、社会学文摘数据库、考克兰图书馆和经济文献数据库)中识别出1990年1月至2011年12月期间在美国开展并以英文发表的、聚焦于涉及乳腺癌、宫颈癌和/或结直肠癌的特殊活动的文章。研究纳入和数据提取由两名研究人员独立验证。
在从1409篇文章中筛选出的20篇用于筛查的文章中,有十篇关于特殊活动的文章报告了结果数据。发现了五种特殊活动类型:健康博览会、派对、文化活动、特殊日子和戏剧表演。许多活动仅聚焦于乳腺癌,或与其他癌症相结合。参与人数从50人至1732人不等。所有特殊活动都至少采用了预防服务社区指南建议的一种循证策略,如小型媒体宣传、一对一教育以及减少结构性障碍。对于作为活动结果的癌症筛查,乳房X光检查筛查率从4.8%至88%不等,巴氏试验为3.9%,临床乳房检查从9.1%至100%不等。对于结直肠癌筛查,粪便潜血试验从29.4%至76%不等,在一次活动中乙状结肠镜检查率为100%。结果指标包括筛查意愿、预约安排、临床检查的接受情况以及癌症筛查的参与情况。
综述中发现的特殊活动各不相同且采用了循证策略。筛查数据表明,一些特殊活动可导致癌症筛查率上升,尤其是在提供现场筛查服务的情况下。然而,没有足够证据证明特殊活动在提高癌症筛查方面有效。所服务人群的异质性、活动内容、评估的结果变量以及依赖自我报告来衡量筛查情况限制了结论。本研究强调需要进一步开展研究以确定特殊活动在提高癌症筛查方面的有效性。