Suppr超能文献

按行业划分的听力出现变化的工人患病率:职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)和美国国家职业安全卫生研究所(NIOSH)听力变化标准的比较

Prevalence of workers with shifts in hearing by industry: a comparison of OSHA and NIOSH Hearing Shift Criteria.

作者信息

Masterson Elizabeth A, Sweeney Marie Haring, Deddens James A, Themann Christa L, Wall David K

机构信息

The work was performed at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;56(4):446-55. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000124.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of workers with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health significant threshold shifts (NSTS), Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard threshold shifts (OSTS), and with OSTS with age correction (OSTS-A), by industry using North American Industry Classification System codes.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2010, worker audiograms were examined. Prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratios for NSTS were estimated by industry. NSTS, OSTS, and OSTS-A prevalences were compared by industry.

RESULTS

Twenty percent of workers had an NSTS, 14% had an OSTS, and 6% had an OSTS-A. For most industries, the OSTS and OSTS-A criteria identified 28% to 36% and 66% to 74% fewer workers than the NSTS criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NSTS criteria allowing for earlier detection of shifts in hearing is recommended for improved prevention of occupational hearing loss.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用北美行业分类系统代码,按行业比较患有美国国家职业安全与健康研究所显著阈值偏移(NSTS)、美国职业安全与健康管理局标准阈值偏移(OSTS)以及年龄校正后的OSTS(OSTS - A)的工人的患病率。

方法

对2001年至2010年期间工人的听力图进行检查。按行业估算NSTS的患病率和调整后的患病率比值。比较各行业的NSTS、OSTS和OSTS - A患病率。

结果

20%的工人患有NSTS,14%患有OSTS,6%患有OSTS - A。对于大多数行业,OSTS和OSTS - A标准分别比NSTS标准少识别出28%至36%和66%至74%的工人。

结论

建议使用NSTS标准以更早发现听力变化,从而更好地预防职业性听力损失。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss among Workers at a Hammer Forge Company.一家锤锻公司工人的噪声暴露与听力损失
Semin Hear. 2023 Jun 16;44(4):485-502. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769498. eCollection 2023 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of hearing loss in the United States by industry.美国各行业听力损失的流行率。
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jun;56(6):670-81. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22082. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
2
Occupational hearing loss in Korea.韩国的职业性听力损失。
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Dec;25(Suppl):S62-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.S.S62. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
7
Audiometric "early flags" for occupational hearing loss.
J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Dec;49(12):1310-6. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31815d1076.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验