Shere Mahvash, Zhao Xiu Yan, Koren Gideon
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; The Motherisk Program, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092744. eCollection 2014.
Recruitment of women in the periconceptional period to clinical studies using traditional advertising through medical establishments is difficult and slow. Given the widespread use of the internet as a source for medical information and research, we analyze the impact of social media in the second phase of an ongoing randomized, open-label clinical trial among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of social media as a recruitment tool through the comparison of diverse recruitment techniques in two different phases of the trial.
Recruitment in Phase 1 of the study consisted solely of traditional healthcare-based sources. This was compared to Phase 2 of the study where traditional recruitment was continued and expanded, while social media was used as a supplementary source. Yearly recruitment and recruitment rates in the two phases were compared using the Mann Whitney U test. The contributions of each recruitment source to overall recruitment were analyzed, and the impact of potential confounders on recruitment rate was evaluated using a multiple regression and Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
In the first phase of the study, with over 56 months of recruitment using traditional sources, 35 women were enrolled in the study, resulting in a mean rate of ±0.62 recruits/month. In the 6 months implementing recruitment through social media, 45 women were recruited, for a 12-fold higher rate of ±7.5 recruits/month. Attrition rates remained constant, suggesting that social media had a positive impact on recruitment. The Interrupted Time Series Analysis detected a significant difference in recruitment after the intervention of social media (p<0.0001) with an evident increase in the number of recruits observed after the use of social media.
Clinicians and scientists recruiting for clinical studies should learn how to use online social media platforms to improve recruitment rates, thus increasing recruitment efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
在围孕期通过医疗机构采用传统广告方式招募女性参与临床研究困难且进展缓慢。鉴于互联网作为医学信息和研究来源的广泛使用,我们分析了社交媒体在一项正在进行的针对孕妇的随机、开放标签临床试验第二阶段中的影响。本研究旨在通过比较试验两个不同阶段的多种招募技术,评估社交媒体作为招募工具的有效性。
研究的第一阶段招募仅包括基于传统医疗保健的来源。将其与研究的第二阶段进行比较,第二阶段在继续并扩大传统招募的同时,将社交媒体用作补充来源。使用曼-惠特尼U检验比较两个阶段的年度招募量和招募率。分析每个招募来源对总体招募的贡献,并使用多元回归和中断时间序列分析评估潜在混杂因素对招募率的影响。
在研究的第一阶段,使用传统来源进行了超过56个月的招募,有35名女性参与研究,平均招募率为±0.62名/月。在通过社交媒体进行招募的6个月中,招募了45名女性,招募率提高了12倍,达到±7.5名/月。损耗率保持不变,表明社交媒体对招募有积极影响。中断时间序列分析检测到社交媒体干预后招募存在显著差异(p<0.0001),使用社交媒体后观察到的招募人数明显增加。
招募临床研究参与者的临床医生和科学家应学习如何使用在线社交媒体平台来提高招募率,从而提高招募效率和成本效益。