Derlet Robert W, McNamara Robert M, Kazzi Amin Antoine, Richards John R
University of California Davis Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;15(2):137-41. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.11.18645.
We report the case of a 32-year-old male recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes treated at an urban university emergency department (ED) crowded to 250% over capacity. His initial symptoms of shortness of breath and feeling ill for several days were evaluated with chest radiograph, electrocardiogram (EKG), and laboratory studies, which suggested mild diabetic ketoacidosis. His medical care in the ED was conducted in a crowded hallway. After correction of his metabolic abnormalities he felt improved and was discharged with arrangements made for outpatient follow-up. Two days later he returned in cardiac arrest, and resuscitation efforts failed. The autopsy was significant for multiple acute and chronic pulmonary emboli but no coronary artery disease. The hospital settled the case for $1 million and allocated major responsibility to the treating emergency physician (EP). As a result the state medical board named the EP in a disciplinary action, claiming negligence because the EKG had not been personally interpreted by that physician. A formal hearing was conducted with the EP's medical license placed in jeopardy. This case illustrates the risk to EPs who treat patients in crowded hallways, where it is difficult to provide the highest level of care. This case also demonstrates the failure of hospital administration to accept responsibility and provide resources to the ED to ensure patient safety.
我们报告了一例32岁男性病例,该患者最近被诊断为2型糖尿病,在一家城市大学急诊科接受治疗,当时该急诊科人满为患,超出容量250%。他最初出现呼吸急促和不适数天的症状,接受了胸部X光、心电图(EKG)和实验室检查,结果提示为轻度糖尿病酮症酸中毒。他在急诊科的治疗是在拥挤的走廊里进行的。纠正代谢异常后,他感觉有所好转并出院,同时安排了门诊随访。两天后,他因心脏骤停返回医院,复苏 efforts失败。尸检发现有多处急性和慢性肺栓塞,但无冠状动脉疾病。医院以100万美元了结此案,并将主要责任归咎于主治急诊医生(EP)。结果,州医学委员会对该急诊医生采取了纪律处分,称其存在疏忽,因为该医生没有亲自解读心电图。为此举行了正式听证会,该急诊医生的医疗执照面临风险。此案例说明了在拥挤走廊中治疗患者的急诊医生所面临的风险,在这种情况下很难提供最高水平的护理。该案例还表明医院管理部门未能承担责任并为急诊科提供资源以确保患者安全。