Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 29;14:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-38.
Though a newly developed spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) is at the center of interests for many ophthalmologic researchers and clinicians, its own characteristics are not fully evaluated yet. The main purpose of this study was to establish the adjusted color probability codes for peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in healthy Koreans and to compare them with original color codes provided by spectral domain OCT.
Two hundred ninety-five healthy Korean eyes were enrolled and their peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured by Cirrus OCT. For each decade of age, the normal thickness reference was determined on the basis of z-scores and the adjusted color probability codes were established. Then the agreements between adjusted and original color codes were calculated using weighted Kappa (Kw) coefficient.
On the basis of Kw coefficient, the overall agreement between the adjusted and original probability color codes was not excellent (Kw range of 0.500 to 0.806). If the adjusted probability codes were assumed as a standard of comparison, the original color codes showed the false-negative in 11% of eyes and the false-positive in 0.3% of eyes for average RNFL thickness.
Adjusted color probability codes judged by the Korean normative data showed a discrepancy with original codes. It implies that normal reference and adjusted probability codes for each ethnicity might be needed to determine whether a certain RNFL thickness is within normal range or not.
尽管新兴的谱域光相干断层扫描(OCT)技术引起了许多眼科研究人员和临床医生的关注,但它的自身特点尚未得到充分评估。本研究的主要目的是建立韩国人正常周边视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的调整后彩色概率编码,并与谱域 OCT 提供的原始彩色编码进行比较。
共纳入 295 只健康的韩国人眼,使用 Cirrus OCT 测量其周边 RNFL 厚度。根据 z 分数确定每个 10 岁年龄组的正常厚度参考值,并建立调整后的彩色概率编码。然后,使用加权 Kappa(Kw)系数计算调整后和原始彩色编码之间的一致性。
根据 Kw 系数,调整后和原始概率彩色编码之间的总体一致性不是很好(Kw 范围为 0.500 至 0.806)。如果假设调整后的概率编码为比较标准,那么原始颜色编码在平均 RNFL 厚度方面,有 11%的眼睛显示假阴性,0.3%的眼睛显示假阳性。
根据韩国正常数据判断的调整后彩色概率编码与原始编码存在差异。这表明,需要为每个种族确定正常参考值和调整后的概率编码,以确定特定的 RNFL 厚度是否在正常范围内。