Teh Ai Ling, Pan Hong, Chen Li, Ong Mei-Lyn, Dogra Shaillay, Wong Johnny, MacIsaac Julia L, Mah Sarah M, McEwen Lisa M, Saw Seang-Mei, Godfrey Keith M, Chong Yap-Seng, Kwek Kenneth, Kwoh Chee-Keong, Soh Shu-E, Chong Mary F F, Barton Sheila, Karnani Neerja, Cheong Clara Y, Buschdorf Jan Paul, Stünkel Walter, Kobor Michael S, Meaney Michael J, Gluckman Peter D, Holbrook Joanna D
Singapore Institute of Clinical Sciences (SICS), A*STAR, Brenner Centre for Molecular Medicine, Singapore 117609;
Singapore Institute of Clinical Sciences (SICS), A*STAR, Brenner Centre for Molecular Medicine, Singapore 117609; School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore 639798;
Genome Res. 2014 Jul;24(7):1064-74. doi: 10.1101/gr.171439.113. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
Integrating the genotype with epigenetic marks holds the promise of better understanding the biology that underlies the complex interactions of inherited and environmental components that define the developmental origins of a range of disorders. The quality of the in utero environment significantly influences health over the lifecourse. Epigenetics, and in particular DNA methylation marks, have been postulated as a mechanism for the enduring effects of the prenatal environment. Accordingly, neonate methylomes contain molecular memory of the individual in utero experience. However, interindividual variation in methylation can also be a consequence of DNA sequence polymorphisms that result in methylation quantitative trait loci (methQTLs) and, potentially, the interaction between fixed genetic variation and environmental influences. We surveyed the genotypes and DNA methylomes of 237 neonates and found 1423 punctuate regions of the methylome that were highly variable across individuals, termed variably methylated regions (VMRs), against a backdrop of homogeneity. MethQTLs were readily detected in neonatal methylomes, and genotype alone best explained ∼25% of the VMRs. We found that the best explanation for 75% of VMRs was the interaction of genotype with different in utero environments, including maternal smoking, maternal depression, maternal BMI, infant birth weight, gestational age, and birth order. Our study sheds new light on the complex relationship between biological inheritance as represented by genotype and individual prenatal experience and suggests the importance of considering both fixed genetic variation and environmental factors in interpreting epigenetic variation.
将基因型与表观遗传标记相结合,有望更好地理解一系列疾病发育起源中遗传和环境成分复杂相互作用背后的生物学机制。子宫内环境的质量在整个生命过程中对健康有显著影响。表观遗传学,尤其是DNA甲基化标记,被认为是产前环境产生持久影响的一种机制。因此,新生儿甲基化组包含个体子宫内经历的分子记忆。然而,甲基化的个体间差异也可能是DNA序列多态性的结果,这些多态性导致甲基化数量性状位点(methQTLs),以及固定遗传变异与环境影响之间的潜在相互作用。我们对237名新生儿的基因型和DNA甲基化组进行了调查,发现在甲基化组的背景下,有1423个点状区域在个体间高度可变,称为可变甲基化区域(VMRs)。在新生儿甲基化组中很容易检测到methQTLs,仅基因型就能最好地解释约25%的VMRs。我们发现,75%的VMRs的最佳解释是基因型与不同子宫内环境的相互作用,包括母亲吸烟、母亲抑郁、母亲体重指数、婴儿出生体重、胎龄和出生顺序。我们的研究为基因型所代表的生物遗传与个体产前经历之间的复杂关系提供了新的见解,并表明在解释表观遗传变异时考虑固定遗传变异和环境因素的重要性。