Voils Corrine I, King Heather A, Maciejewski Matthew L, Allen Kelli D, Yancy William S, Shaffer Jonathan A
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Dec;48(3):392-401. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9618-7.
There is little guidance about to how select dose parameter values when designing behavioral interventions.
The purpose of this study is to present approaches to inform intervention duration, frequency, and amount when (1) the investigator has no a priori expectation and is seeking a descriptive approach for identifying and narrowing the universe of dose values or (2) the investigator has an a priori expectation and is seeking validation of this expectation using an inferential approach.
Strengths and weaknesses of various approaches are described and illustrated with examples.
Descriptive approaches include retrospective analysis of data from randomized trials, assessment of perceived optimal dose via prospective surveys or interviews of key stakeholders, and assessment of target patient behavior via prospective, longitudinal, observational studies. Inferential approaches include nonrandomized, early-phase trials and randomized designs.
By utilizing these approaches, researchers may more efficiently apply resources to identify the optimal values of dose parameters for behavioral interventions.
在设计行为干预措施时,关于如何选择剂量参数值的指导很少。
本研究的目的是提出一些方法,以便在以下情况下确定干预持续时间、频率和量:(1)研究者没有先验期望,正在寻求一种描述性方法来识别和缩小剂量值范围;(2)研究者有先验期望,正在寻求使用推断性方法来验证这一期望。
描述了各种方法的优缺点,并举例说明。
描述性方法包括对随机试验数据的回顾性分析、通过对关键利益相关者的前瞻性调查或访谈来评估感知到的最佳剂量,以及通过前瞻性、纵向观察性研究来评估目标患者行为。推断性方法包括非随机早期试验和随机设计。
通过利用这些方法,研究人员可以更有效地应用资源来确定行为干预措施剂量参数的最佳值。