Taylor Anne W, Pilkington Rhiannon, Feist Helen, Dal Grande Eleonora, Hugo Graeme
Population Research & Outcome Studies, Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 14;14:355. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-355.
Governments have been implementing policies aimed at halting the trend towards early retirement for Baby Boomers. Public policies can have a strong effect on when a person retires and this analysis contributes to an improved understanding of retirement aspirations in regards to health, social, workplace and economic determinants.
In October 2011 a telephone survey was undertaken with participants aged 50 to 65 years who were in paid employment and who had been in the workforce for the previous three years. Participants were obtained from two identical South Australian cohort studies - the North West Adelaide Health Study and the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study. The results of the telephone survey were linked to the original cohort data. Data were weighted by sex, age, postcode and probability of selection in the household. Work related questions included how much they thought about their retirement, current occupation, employment status, type of workplace and hours worked per week. Health related questions included current smoking status, physical activity, body mass index, self-reported health status and overall life satisfaction. Uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were undertaken to compare the different associations between people who were and were not intending to retire.
In total, 25.9% (n = 210) of people who were currently in paid employment indicated that they intend to retire completely from the workforce. The remainder indicated that they will continue to work (41.8% retire from full-time work but work part-time, 25.7% continue working part-time but reduce their current hours, and 6.7% never retire). The multi-variable results indicate that those with lower education, having a savings habit, and sales workers more likely to anticipate complete retirement. The self-employed, and those thinking only moderately about retirement, were more likely to extend their working life beyond age 65.
An important finding of this study is the large number of Baby Boomers who indicated that they would be happy to work part-time or never retire. Policies and continued dialogue aimed at making the workplace a safe, flexible and welcoming environment to accommodate this wish, and to entice others to take up this option over complete withdrawal from the labour force, is required.
政府一直在实施相关政策,旨在遏制婴儿潮一代提前退休的趋势。公共政策对一个人的退休时间可能会产生重大影响,而本分析有助于增进对健康、社会、工作场所和经济等因素对退休意愿影响的理解。
2011年10月,对年龄在50至65岁之间、有带薪工作且在过去三年中一直在职的参与者进行了电话调查。参与者来自南澳大利亚州两项相同的队列研究——西北阿德莱德健康研究和弗洛里阿德莱德男性衰老研究。电话调查结果与原始队列数据相关联。数据按性别、年龄、邮政编码和家庭中被选中的概率进行加权。与工作相关的问题包括他们对退休的思考程度、当前职业、就业状况、工作场所类型和每周工作时长。与健康相关的问题包括当前吸烟状况、体育活动、体重指数、自我报告的健康状况和总体生活满意度。进行了单变量和多变量分析,以比较打算退休和不打算退休的人群之间的不同关联。
目前有带薪工作的人中,总计25.9%(n = 210)表示他们打算完全退出劳动力市场。其余人表示他们将继续工作(41.8%从全职工作退休但从事兼职工作,25.7%继续从事兼职工作但减少当前工作时长,6.7%永不退休)。多变量结果表明,受教育程度较低、有储蓄习惯的人和销售人员更有可能预期完全退休。个体经营者以及那些对退休思考程度一般的人,更有可能将工作年限延长至65岁以后。
本研究的一项重要发现是,大量婴儿潮一代表示他们愿意从事兼职工作或永不退休。需要制定政策并持续开展对话,以使工作场所成为一个安全、灵活且受欢迎的环境,以满足这一愿望,并吸引其他人选择这种方式而非完全退出劳动力市场。