Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Department of Biomolecular Engineering Applied Molecular Bioscience, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8611, Japan.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:819395. doi: 10.1155/2014/819395. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
We determined comparative efficacy of i-Scan for detection and diagnosis of gastric cancer. Ten patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer based on histopathological findings were analyzed. White light and i-Scan moving images recorded from these patients in twin mode were separated into white light and i-Scan. Twelve endoscopists (three different skill levels) blinded to patient information evaluated the images. Correlation between demarcation accuracy and lesion brightness on still images was investigated. No significant differences were found in diagnostic accuracy between white light and i-Scan moving images for tumor detection rate (91.7% versus 90.8%, P = 0.777). Diagnostic accuracy of tumor size was comparable between novice and experienced endoscopists for i-Scan moving images (65.7% versus 71.1%, P = 0.528), whereas it was significantly lower for white light moving images (41.2% versus 79.5%, P = 0.019). Tumor demarcation accuracy was significantly better with white light than i-Scan still images (71.0% versus 65.8%, P = 0.033). Correlations between demarcation accuracy and brightness reached highs of 0.75 for white light and 0.89 for i-Scan imaging. Efficacy of i-Scan over that of white light imaging for detecting and diagnosing gastric cancer was not shown; however, the diagnostic capability of i-Scan can be improved if imaging conditions are optimized.
我们旨在研究 i-Scan 在胃癌检测和诊断中的比较疗效。分析了 10 例经组织病理学检查确诊为早期胃癌的患者。这些患者的白光和 i-Scan 动态图像以双模式记录下来,并将其分为白光和 i-Scan 图像。12 名内镜医师(三个不同技能水平)在不了解患者信息的情况下评估图像。研究了图像中边界准确性与病灶亮度之间的相关性。白光和 i-Scan 动态图像在肿瘤检测率方面的诊断准确性没有显著差异(91.7%对 90.8%,P=0.777)。对于 i-Scan 动态图像,新手和经验丰富的内镜医师在肿瘤大小的诊断准确性方面相当(65.7%对 71.1%,P=0.528),而白光动态图像的诊断准确性则显著较低(41.2%对 79.5%,P=0.019)。白光比 i-Scan 静态图像的肿瘤边界准确性更好(71.0%对 65.8%,P=0.033)。边界准确性与亮度之间的相关性在白光图像中高达 0.75,在 i-Scan 成像中高达 0.89。并未显示 i-Scan 在检测和诊断胃癌方面优于白光成像的疗效;但是,如果优化成像条件,i-Scan 的诊断能力可以得到提高。