Charalampakis Georgios, Ramberg Per, Dahlén Gunnar, Berglundh Tord, Abrahamsson Ingemar
Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):931-936. doi: 10.1111/clr.12397. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
To study the combined effect of mechanical and chemical cleansing on a 4-day biofilm grown intra-orally on titanium discs with different surface characteristics.
Twenty subjects used a splint with two metal plates in the upper jaw. Each plate was placed in the premolar-molar region and carried four titanium discs with four different surface characteristics (OsseoSpeed(™), TiOblast(™), experimental and turned surface). After 4 days of biofilm growth, the discs were cleaned mechanically and chemically with saline or chlorhexidine. Following cleansing, microbial samples were obtained and analysed by culture. The titanium discs were processed for scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. The experiment was repeated 3 days later using delmopinol or a mixture of essential oils during cleansing.
The combination of mechanical and chemical cleansing was ineffective in complete biofilm removal from all four titanium discs. The microbiological analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences between surface types or between cleaning agents regarding logarithmic mean counts of CFU for specific bacteria, aerobes, anaerobes or the TVC. Aerobes were more numerous than anaerobes on all surface types. The SEM analysis disclosed that the remaining biofilm on moderately rough surfaces (OsseoSpeed(™), TiOblast(™) and experimental) was complex and firmly attached, while the biofilm on turned surface had a pattern of spread bacteria forming less clusters.
Cleansing may call for prolonged time of chemomechanical debridement and/or more effective disinfectants to suppress biofilms on dental implant surfaces.
研究机械清洁和化学清洁对在具有不同表面特性的钛盘上口腔内生长4天的生物膜的联合作用。
20名受试者用上颌带有两块金属板的夹板。每块板放置在双尖牙-磨牙区域,带有四个具有四种不同表面特性的钛盘(OsseoSpeed™、TiOblast™、实验性表面和车削表面)。生物膜生长4天后,用盐水或氯己定对钛盘进行机械和化学清洁。清洁后,获取微生物样本并通过培养进行分析。对钛盘进行处理以进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。3天后重复该实验,清洁过程中使用地莫匹醇或精油混合物。
机械清洁和化学清洁的联合在从所有四个钛盘上完全去除生物膜方面无效。微生物分析未显示在表面类型之间或清洁剂之间在特定细菌、需氧菌、厌氧菌或总活菌数的CFU对数平均计数方面有任何统计学上的显著差异。在所有表面类型上,需氧菌比厌氧菌更多。SEM分析表明,中等粗糙度表面(OsseoSpeed™、TiOblast™和实验性表面)上残留的生物膜复杂且牢固附着,而车削表面上的生物膜具有细菌扩散形成较少簇的模式。
清洁可能需要延长化学机械清创时间和/或更有效的消毒剂来抑制牙种植体表面的生物膜。