Potter J M, Reid D B, Shaw R J, Hackett P, Hickman P E
Department of Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands.
BMJ. 1989 Jul 15;299(6692):150-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6692.150.
To estimate the prevalence of important side effects in patients with malignant disease who were receiving high doses of morphine as part of their palliative treatment.
Data on patients were collected over 12 months.
Two palliative care units in Western Australia.
19 Patients with malignant disease who were receiving morphine either subcutaneously or orally as the main analgesic. 10 Patients receiving a total daily dose of morphine of at least 500 mg orally or 250 mg parenterally were enrolled in the study. The other 9 patients were enrolled after an important problem thought to be related to the morphine had been identified. All of the patients were taking drugs to supplement the treatment.
The dose of morphine or route of administration, or both, was changed in three patients.
Determination of the prevalence of side effects in the patients. Assessment of the relation of any side effects with the supplemental drugs taken by the patients.
Plasma morphine and electrolyte concentrations were measured and a full history taken for each patient. Thirteen of the 19 patients had an important side effect; 12 of them had myoclonus and one had hyperalgesia of the skin. Plasma morphine concentrations were similar in patients with and without myoclonus, ranging from 158 to 3465 nmol/l and 39 to 2821 nmol/l respectively. Eight of the patients with side effects were taking an antipsychotic drug concurrently compared with none of those without side effects. A greater proportion of patients with side effects were taking the antinauseant drug thiethylperazine (6/13 v 2/6) and at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (10/13 v 2/6), whereas a smaller proportion were taking a glucocorticosteroid (3/13 v 4/6). The estimated prevalence of important side effects in the total population of patients receiving palliative treatment in the two units was 2.7-3.6%.
Myoclonus as a side effect of treatment with morphine is more likely to occur in patients taking antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs as antiemetics or as adjuvant agents or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for additional analgesia. If a patient develops myoclonus the best approach may be to change the supplemental treatment.
评估接受高剂量吗啡进行姑息治疗的恶性疾病患者中严重副作用的发生率。
对患者数据进行了为期12个月的收集。
西澳大利亚的两个姑息治疗病房。
19例接受皮下或口服吗啡作为主要镇痛药的恶性疾病患者。10例口服吗啡日总剂量至少500mg或胃肠外给药250mg的患者纳入研究。另外9例患者是在发现一个被认为与吗啡相关的重要问题后纳入的。所有患者均服用药物辅助治疗。
3例患者的吗啡剂量或给药途径或两者均发生了改变。
确定患者中副作用的发生率。评估任何副作用与患者所服用辅助药物之间的关系。
对每位患者测量了血浆吗啡和电解质浓度并采集了完整病史。19例患者中有13例出现严重副作用;其中12例出现肌阵挛,1例出现皮肤痛觉过敏。有和没有肌阵挛的患者血浆吗啡浓度相似,分别为158至3465nmol/L和39至2821nmol/L。出现副作用的患者中有8例同时服用抗精神病药物,而无副作用的患者中无人服用。出现副作用的患者中服用抗恶心药物硫乙拉嗪的比例更高(6/13比2/6),且至少服用一种非甾体抗炎药的比例更高(10/13比2/6),而服用糖皮质激素的比例更低(3/13比4/6)。两个病房接受姑息治疗的患者总体中严重副作用的估计发生率为2.7 - 3.6%。
作为吗啡治疗副作用的肌阵挛更有可能发生在服用抗抑郁药或抗精神病药物作为止吐药或辅助药物或服用非甾体抗炎药以增强镇痛效果的患者中。如果患者出现肌阵挛,最佳方法可能是改变辅助治疗。