Alpert Medical School of Brown University; Bradley-Hasbro Children's Research Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;71(6):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.170.
Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been established as efficacious for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) among older children and adolescents, yet its effect on young children has not been evaluated sufficiently.
To examine the relative efficacy of family-based CBT (FB-CBT) involving exposure plus response prevention vs an FB relaxation treatment (FB-RT) control condition for children 5 to 8 years of age.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 14-week randomized clinical trial (Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study for Young Children [POTS Jr]) conducted at 3 academic medical centers between 2006 and 2011, involving 127 pediatric outpatients 5 to 8 years of age who received a primary diagnosis of OCD and a Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score of 16 or higher.
Participants were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of (1) FB-CBT, including exposure plus response prevention, or (2) FB-RT.
Responder status defined as an independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) and change in independent evaluator-rated continuous Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score. RESULTS Family-based CBT was superior to FB-RT on both primary outcome measures. The percentages of children who were rated as 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale at 14 weeks were 72% for FB-CBT and 41% for FB-RT. The effect size difference between FB-CBT and FB-RT on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17-0.45). The number needed to treat (NNT) with FB-CBT vs FB-RT was estimated as 3.2 (95% CI, 2.2-5.8). The effect size difference between FB-CBT and FB-RT on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale at week 14 was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62-1.06).
A comprehensive FB-CBT program was superior to a relaxation program with a similar format in reducing OCD symptoms and functional impairment in young children (5-8 years of age) with OCD.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00533806.
认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明对年龄较大的儿童和青少年的强迫症(OCD)有效,但对幼儿的影响尚未得到充分评估。
研究针对 5 至 8 岁儿童的基于家庭的认知行为疗法(FB-CBT),包括暴露和反应预防,与基于家庭的放松治疗(FB-RT)对照治疗相比的相对疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项于 2006 年至 2011 年在 3 个学术医疗中心进行的为期 14 周的随机临床试验(儿科强迫症治疗研究),共涉及 127 名 5 至 8 岁的儿科门诊患者,他们接受了强迫症的主要诊断和儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表总分 16 或更高。
参与者被随机分配接受 14 周的(1)FB-CBT,包括暴露和反应预防,或(2)FB-RT。
反应者状态定义为独立评估者评定的临床总体印象-改善量表评分为 1(明显改善)或 2(改善)和独立评估者评定的连续儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表总分的变化。
基于家庭的认知行为疗法在主要结局测量上均优于基于家庭的放松疗法。在 14 周时,根据临床总体印象-改善量表评定,分别有 72%的 FB-CBT 儿童和 41%的 FB-RT 儿童被评为 1(明显改善)或 2(改善)。FB-CBT 和 FB-RT 在临床总体印象-改善量表上的效应量差异为 0.31(95%置信区间,0.17-0.45)。FB-CBT 与 FB-RT 的治疗人数比(NNT)估计为 3.2(95%置信区间,2.2-5.8)。在第 14 周时,FB-CBT 和 FB-RT 在儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表上的效应量差异为 0.84(95%置信区间,0.62-1.06)。
综合的基于家庭的认知行为疗法方案在减少患有强迫症的幼儿(5-8 岁)的 OCD 症状和功能障碍方面优于具有类似格式的放松方案。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00533806。