Suppr超能文献

互联网递增效度治疗方案与面对面认知行为疗法治疗儿童和青少年强迫症症状的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of an Internet-Delivered Stepped-Care Program vs In-Person Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

JAMA. 2021 May 11;325(18):1863-1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3839.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In most countries, young people with obsessive-compulsive disorder have limited access to specialist cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a first-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether internet-delivered CBT implemented in a stepped-care model is noninferior to in-person CBT for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial conducted at 2 specialist child and adolescent mental health clinics in Sweden. Participants included 152 individuals aged 8 to 17 years with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Enrollment began in October 2017 and ended in May 2019. Follow-up ended in April 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants randomized to the stepped-care group (n = 74) received internet-delivered CBT for 16 weeks. Nonresponders at the 3-month follow-up were then offered a course of traditional face-to-face treatment. Participants randomized to the control group (n = 78) immediately received in-person CBT for 16 weeks. Nonresponders at the 3-month follow-up received additional face-to-face treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the masked assessor-rated Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) score at the 6-month follow-up. The scale includes 10 items rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), yielding a total score range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Assessors were masked to treatment allocation at pretreatment, posttreatment, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up assessments. The predefined noninferiority margin was 4 points on the CY-BOCS.

RESULTS

Among the 152 randomized participants (mean age, 13.4 years; 94 [62%] females), 151 (99%) completed the trial. At the 3-month follow-up, 34 participants (46%) in the stepped-care group and 23 (30%) in the in-person CBT group were nonresponders. At the 6-month follow-up, the CY-BOCS score was 11.57 points in the stepped-care group vs 10.57 points in the face-to-face treatment group, corresponding to an estimated mean difference of 0.91 points ([1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.28]; P for noninferiority = .02). Increased anxiety (30%-36%) and depressive symptoms (20%-28%) were the most frequently reported adverse events in both groups. There were 2 unrelated serious adverse events (1 in each group).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder, treatment with an internet-delivered CBT program followed by in-person CBT if necessary compared with in-person CBT alone resulted in a noninferior difference in symptoms at the 6-month follow-up. Further research is needed to understand the durability and generalizability of these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263546.

摘要

重要性

在大多数国家,患有强迫症的年轻人获得专科认知行为疗法(CBT)的机会有限,而 CBT 是强迫症的一线治疗方法。

目的

研究在阶梯式护理模式中实施的互联网提供的 CBT 是否不比面对面的 CBT 更适用于儿科强迫症。

设计、地点和参与者:在瑞典的 2 家专业儿童和青少年心理健康诊所进行的一项随机临床试验。参与者包括 152 名年龄在 8 至 17 岁之间的强迫症患者。招募于 2017 年 10 月开始,2019 年 5 月结束。随访于 2020 年 4 月结束。

干预措施

随机分配到阶梯式护理组的参与者(n=74)接受了 16 周的互联网提供的 CBT。在 3 个月随访时无反应的患者随后接受了传统面对面治疗的疗程。随机分配到对照组的参与者(n=78)立即接受了 16 周的面对面 CBT。在 3 个月随访时无反应的患者接受了额外的面对面治疗。

主要结果和测量

主要结局是在 6 个月随访时评估者评定的儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)评分。该量表包含 10 个项目,从 0(无症状)到 4(极度症状)评分,总得分范围为 0 到 40,得分越高表示症状越严重。评估者在治疗前、治疗后、3 个月随访和 6 个月随访时均对治疗分配进行了盲法评估。预设的非劣效性边界为 CY-BOCS 的 4 分。

结果

在 152 名随机参与者中(平均年龄 13.4 岁,94 [62%] 为女性),151 名(99%)完成了试验。在 3 个月随访时,阶梯式护理组有 34 名(46%)患者和面对面治疗组有 23 名(30%)患者无反应。在 6 个月随访时,阶梯式护理组的 CY-BOCS 评分为 11.57 分,面对面治疗组为 10.57 分,估计平均差异为 0.91 分([1 侧 97.5%CI,-∞ 至 3.28];P 值非劣效性=0.02)。两组中最常报告的不良事件是焦虑增加(30%-36%)和抑郁症状(20%-28%)。两组各有 1 例与治疗无关的严重不良事件。

结论和相关性

在患有强迫症的儿童和青少年中,与单独面对面 CBT 相比,接受互联网提供的 CBT 方案治疗,如有必要再进行面对面 CBT,在 6 个月随访时症状改善程度无差异。需要进一步研究以了解这些发现的持久性和普遍性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03263546。

相似文献

10
One-Year Outcome for Responders of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.儿童强迫症认知行为治疗应答者的一年预后。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;56(11):940-947.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Early intervention for obsessive compulsive disorder: An expert consensus statement.强迫症的早期干预:专家共识声明。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Apr;29(4):549-565. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验