Lee Chae-Woo, Hyun Ju, Kim Seong Gil
Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Apr;26(4):475-7. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.475. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of mat Pilates and apparatus Pilates on pain and static balance of businesswomen with chronic back pain. [Subjects and Methods] Participants were randomly allocated to Pilates mat exercises (PME) or Pilates apparatus exercise (PAE), and performed the appropriate Pilates exercises 3 days per week for 8 weeks. In order to measure the improvement in the participants' static balance ability as a result of the exercise, the sway length and sway velocity of the subjects were measured before and after the experiment while the subjects stood on a Balance Performance Monitor (BPM) facing the front wall for 30 seconds with their eyes open. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain. [Results] The VAS score, sway length, and sway velocity of both groups decreased significantly after the experiment, but the PME group showed a greater decrease than the PAE group. [Conclusion] PME showed greater improvement in pain level and balance compared with PAE in this research. Since the subjects of this study were patients with low back pain, PME is assumed to have been more suitable and effective because it uses body weight to strengthen core muscles rather than heavier apparatuses as in PAE.
[目的]本研究旨在探讨垫上普拉提和器械普拉提对患有慢性背痛的职业女性的疼痛和静态平衡的影响。[对象与方法]参与者被随机分配到普拉提垫上练习(PME)组或普拉提器械练习(PAE)组,每周进行3天相应的普拉提练习,共8周。为了测量运动对参与者静态平衡能力的改善情况,在实验前后,让受试者面对前墙站在平衡性能监测仪(BPM)上睁眼30秒,测量其摆动长度和摆动速度。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量疼痛程度。[结果]实验后两组的VAS评分、摆动长度和摆动速度均显著降低,但PME组的降低幅度大于PAE组。[结论]在本研究中,与PAE相比,PME在疼痛程度和平衡方面显示出更大的改善。由于本研究的受试者为腰痛患者,PME被认为更合适且有效,因为它利用体重来增强核心肌肉,而不像PAE那样使用较重的器械。