Suppr超能文献

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷 C30 的大多数领域具有可靠性。

Most domains of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 are reliable.

机构信息

York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Market Square, York YO10 5NH, UK; Research Innovation Office, University of York, York YO10 5DG, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):952-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study's aim was to assess the internal reliability for the nine domains of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) to evaluate homogeneity across clinical studies and whether sample characteristics predict coefficient heterogeneity.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A systematic literature review was undertaken. Internal reliability was assessed against Cronbach α coefficient >0.70. Reliability generalization was undertaken using fixed- and random-effects models. A weighted least squares regression model was applied to determine whether baseline sample characteristics (language, percentage of women, sample size, sample means and standard deviations, and cancer type) predicted variation in α coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies were identified. Eight domains demonstrated good internal reliability (unweighted/weighted by sample variance). One domain, Cognitive Functioning, consistently performed poorly. In terms of moderating variables, none of the sample characteristic variables explained sample variance for the Physical or Role Functioning domains. For the other domains, language, percentage of women, and sample means and variances accounted for some of the heterogeneity observed.

CONCLUSION

Most domains on the EORTC QLQ-C30 are reliable and may therefore be used to help inform decision-making processes, such as those involving individual patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)九个领域的内部信度,以评估其在临床研究中的同质性,以及样本特征是否能预测系数异质性。

研究设计与设置

进行了系统文献回顾。内部信度评估采用 Cronbach α 系数>0.70。采用固定效应和随机效应模型进行可靠性推广。应用加权最小二乘回归模型来确定基线样本特征(语言、女性百分比、样本量、样本均值和标准差以及癌症类型)是否能预测 α 系数的变异。

结果

共确定了 33 项研究。有 8 个领域表现出良好的内部信度(未加权/按样本方差加权)。认知功能领域表现一直不佳。就调节变量而言,样本特征变量均不能解释身体或角色功能领域的样本变异。对于其他领域,语言、女性百分比和样本均值和方差解释了部分观察到的异质性。

结论

EORTC QLQ-C30 的大多数领域是可靠的,因此可以用于帮助做出决策,例如涉及个体患者的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验