Suppr超能文献

妇女健康倡议雌激素加孕激素临床试验的经济回报:一项建模研究。

Economic return from the Women's Health Initiative estrogen plus progestin clinical trial: a modeling study.

作者信息

Roth Joshua A, Etzioni Ruth, Waters Teresa M, Pettinger Mary, Rossouw Jacques E, Anderson Garnet L, Chlebowski Rowan T, Manson Joann E, Hlatky Mark, Johnson Karen C, Ramsey Scott D

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2014 May 6;160(9):594-602. doi: 10.7326/M13-2348.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The findings of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) estrogen plus progestin (E+P) trial led to a substantial reduction in use of combined hormone therapy (cHT) among postmenopausal women in the United States. The economic effect of this shift has not been evaluated relative to the trial's $260 million cost (2012 U.S. dollars).

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the economic return from the WHI E+P trial.

DESIGN

Decision model to simulate health outcomes for a "WHI scenario" with observed cHT use and a "no-WHI scenario" with cHT use extrapolated from the pretrial period.

DATA SOURCES

Primary analyses of WHI outcomes, peer-reviewed literature, and government sources.

TARGET POPULATION

Postmenopausal women in the United States, aged 50 to 79 years, who did not have a hysterectomy.

TIME HORIZON

2003 to 2012.

PERSPECTIVE

Payer.

INTERVENTION

Combined hormone therapy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease incidence, expenditure, quality-adjusted life-years, and net economic return.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The WHI scenario resulted in 4.3 million fewer cHT users, 126,000 fewer breast cancer cases, 76,000 fewer cardiovascular disease cases, 263,000 more fractures, 145,000 more quality-adjusted life-years, and expenditure savings of $35.2 billion. The corresponding net economic return of the trial was $37.1 billion ($140 per dollar invested in the trial) at a willingness-to-pay level of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The 95% CI for the net economic return of the trial was $23.1 to $51.2 billion.

LIMITATION

No evaluation of indirect costs or outcomes beyond 2012.

CONCLUSION

The WHI E+P trial made high-value use of public funds with a substantial return on investment. These results can contribute to discussions about the role of public funding for large, prospective trials with high potential for public health effects.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

摘要

背景

妇女健康倡议(WHI)雌激素加孕激素(E+P)试验的结果导致美国绝经后妇女联合激素疗法(cHT)的使用大幅减少。相对于该试验2.6亿美元的成本(2012年美元),这一转变的经济影响尚未得到评估。

目的

评估WHI E+P试验的经济回报。

设计

决策模型,用于模拟“WHI情景”(根据观察到的cHT使用情况)和“无WHI情景”(根据试验前时期推断的cHT使用情况)的健康结果。

数据来源

WHI结果的主要分析、同行评审文献和政府来源。

目标人群

美国50至79岁未行子宫切除术的绝经后妇女。

时间范围

2003年至2012年。

视角

支付方。

干预措施

联合激素疗法。

结果指标

疾病发病率、支出、质量调整生命年和净经济回报。

基础病例分析结果

WHI情景导致cHT使用者减少430万,乳腺癌病例减少12.6万,心血管疾病病例减少7.6万,骨折增加26.3万,质量调整生命年增加14.5万,支出节省352亿美元。在每质量调整生命年支付意愿为10万美元的水平下,该试验相应的净经济回报为371亿美元(每投入试验1美元回报140美元)。

敏感性分析结果

该试验净经济回报的95%置信区间为231亿至512亿美元。

局限性

未评估2012年以后的间接成本或结果。

结论

WHI E+P试验高效利用了公共资金,投资回报率很高。这些结果有助于讨论公共资金在具有重大公共卫生影响潜力的大型前瞻性试验中的作用。

主要资金来源

国家心肺血液研究所。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Diet and Chronic Disease Research in the Women's Health Initiative.妇女健康倡议中的饮食与慢性病研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 Nov;124(11):1402-1408. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
7
Breast Cancer Prevention: Time for Change.乳腺癌预防:变革之时。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):709-716. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00343. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

6
Estimating the NIH efficient frontier.估计 NIH 有效前沿。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e34569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034569. Epub 2012 May 2.
7
Expected net present value of sample information: from burden to investment.样本信息的预期净现值:从负担到投资。
Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):E11-21. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12443010. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
10
Cost-effectiveness of hormone therapy in the United States.美国的激素治疗的成本效益。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Oct;18(10):1669-77. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1246.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验