Saragiotto Bruno Tirotti, Yamato Tiê Parma, Hespanhol Junior Luiz Carlos, Rainbow Michael J, Davis Irene S, Lopes Alexandre Dias
Master and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, São Paulo Running Injury Group (SPRunIG), Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448, São Paulo, 05077-100, Brazil,
Sports Med. 2014 Aug;44(8):1153-63. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0194-6.
Despite several studies that have been conducted on running injuries, the risk factors for running-related injuries are still not clear in the literature.
The aim of this study was to systematically review prospective cohort studies that investigated the risk factors for running injuries in general.
We conducted electronic searches without restriction of language on EMBASE (1980 to Dec 2012), PUBMED (1946 to Dec 2012), CINAHL (1988 to Dec 2012) SPORTDiscus (1977 to Dec 2012), Latin American and Caribbean Centre on Health Sciences Information (1985 to Dec 2012) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (1998 to Dec 2012) databases, using subject headings, synonyms, relevant terms and variant spellings for each database.
Only prospective cohort studies investigating the risk factors for running-related musculoskeletal injuries were included in this review. Two independent reviewers screened each article and, if they did not reach a consensus, a third reviewer decided whether or not the article should be included.
Year of publication, type of runners, sample size, definition of running-related musculoskeletal injury, baseline characteristics, reported risk factors and the statistical measurement of risk or protection association were extracted from the articles. A scale adapted by the authors evaluated the risk of bias of the articles.
A total of 11 articles were considered eligible in this systematic review. A total of 4,671 pooled participants were analysed and 60 different predictive factors were investigated. The main risk factor reported was previous injury (last 12 months), reported in 5 of the 8 studies that investigated previous injuries as a risk factor. Only one article met the criteria for random selection of the sample and only six articles included a follow-up of 6 months or more. There was no association between gender and running injuries in most of the studies.
It is possible that eligible articles for this review were published in journals that were not indexed in any of the searched databases. We found a great heterogeneity of statistical methods between studies, which prevented us from performing a meta-analysis.
The main risk factor identified in this review was previous injury in the last 12 months, although many risk factors had been investigated in the literature. Relatively few prospective studies were identified in this review, reducing the overall ability to detect risk factors. This highlights the need for more, well designed prospective studies in order to fully appreciate the risk factors associated with running.
尽管已经进行了多项关于跑步损伤的研究,但文献中与跑步相关损伤的风险因素仍不明确。
本研究的目的是系统评价调查一般跑步损伤风险因素的前瞻性队列研究。
我们在EMBASE(1980年至2012年12月)、PUBMED(1946年至2012年12月)、CINAHL(1988年至2012年12月)、SPORTDiscus(1977年至2012年12月)、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学信息中心(1985年至2012年12月)以及科学电子图书馆在线(1998年至2012年12月)数据库中进行了无语言限制的电子检索,使用每个数据库的主题词、同义词、相关术语和变体拼写。
本综述仅纳入调查与跑步相关肌肉骨骼损伤风险因素的前瞻性队列研究。两名独立评审员筛选每篇文章,如果未达成共识,则由第三名评审员决定该文章是否应被纳入。
从文章中提取发表年份、跑步者类型、样本量、与跑步相关肌肉骨骼损伤的定义、基线特征、报告的风险因素以及风险或保护关联的统计测量。作者采用的一个量表评估了文章的偏倚风险。
本系统评价共纳入11篇合格文章。共分析了4671名汇总参与者,并研究了60个不同的预测因素。报告的主要风险因素是既往损伤(过去12个月内),在8项将既往损伤作为风险因素进行研究的研究中有5项报告了这一因素。只有一篇文章符合随机抽样标准,只有6篇文章的随访时间为6个月或更长。大多数研究中性别与跑步损伤之间无关联。
本综述的合格文章可能发表在未被任何检索数据库索引的期刊上。我们发现研究之间的统计方法存在很大异质性,这妨碍了我们进行荟萃分析。
本综述确定的主要风险因素是过去12个月内的既往损伤,尽管文献中已对许多风险因素进行了研究。本综述中确定的前瞻性研究相对较少,降低了检测风险因素的总体能力。这突出表明需要进行更多设计良好的前瞻性研究,以便充分了解与跑步相关的风险因素。