Sunguya Bruno F, Hinthong Woranich, Jimba Masamine, Yasuoka Junko
Department of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2014 May 8;9(5):e96724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096724. eCollection 2014.
Evidence is available on the potential efficacy of interprofessional education (IPE) to foster interprofessional cooperation, improve professional satisfaction, and improve patient care. While the intention of the World Health Organization (WHO) is to implement IPE in all countries, evidence comes from developed countries about its efficiency, challenges, and barriers to planning and implementing IPE. We therefore conducted this review to examine challenges of implementing IPE to suggest possible pathways to overcome the anticipated challenges in developing countries.
We searched for literatures on IPE in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases. We examined challenges or barriers and initiatives to overcome them so as to suggest methods to solve the anticipated challenges in developing countries. We could not conduct a meta-analysis because of the qualitative nature of the research question and the data; instead we conducted a meta-narrative of evidence.
A total of 40 out of 2,146 articles were eligible for analyses in the current review. Only two articles were available from developing countries. Despite the known benefits of IPE, a total of ten challenges or barriers were common based on the retrieved evidence. They included curriculum, leadership, resources, stereotypes and attitudes, variety of students, IPE concept, teaching, enthusiasm, professional jargons, and accreditation. Out of ten, three had already been reported in developing countries: IPE curriculum, resource limitations, and stereotypes.
This study found ten important challenges on implementing IPE. They are curriculum, leadership, resources, stereotypes, students' diversity, IPE concept, teaching, enthusiasm, professional jargons, and accreditation. Although only three of them are already experienced in developing countries, the remaining seven are potentially important for developing countries, too. By knowing these challenges and barriers in advance, those who implement IPE programs in developing countries will be much more prepared, and can enhance the program's potential success.
有证据表明跨专业教育(IPE)在促进跨专业合作、提高职业满意度和改善患者护理方面具有潜在功效。虽然世界卫生组织(WHO)有意在所有国家实施IPE,但关于其在发达国家的效率、挑战以及规划和实施IPE的障碍的证据较多。因此,我们进行了这项综述,以研究实施IPE的挑战,提出克服发展中国家预期挑战的可能途径。
我们在PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和ERIC数据库中搜索有关IPE的文献。我们研究了挑战或障碍以及克服这些障碍的举措,以便提出解决发展中国家预期挑战的方法。由于研究问题和数据的定性性质,我们无法进行荟萃分析;相反,我们对证据进行了元叙事。
在本次综述中,2146篇文章中有40篇符合分析条件。只有两篇文章来自发展中国家。尽管IPE有已知的益处,但根据检索到的证据,共有十个挑战或障碍较为常见。它们包括课程、领导力、资源、刻板印象和态度、学生多样性、IPE概念、教学、积极性、专业术语和认证。在这十个中,有三个已经在发展中国家被报道过:IPE课程、资源限制和刻板印象。
本研究发现了实施IPE的十个重要挑战。它们是课程、领导力、资源、刻板印象、学生多样性、IPE概念、教学、积极性、专业术语和认证。虽然其中只有三个在发展中国家已经出现,但其余七个对发展中国家也可能很重要。通过提前了解这些挑战和障碍,在发展中国家实施IPE项目的人员将更有准备,并可以提高项目的潜在成功率。