• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与公民参与卫生保健:加强伦理支持的必要性。

Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.

作者信息

Williamson Laura

机构信息

a Glasgow Caledonian University.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):4-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900139.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2014.900139
PMID:24809598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4160284/
Abstract

Patient and citizen participation is now regarded as central to the promotion of sustainable health and health care. Involvement efforts create and encounter many diverse ethical challenges that have the potential to enhance or undermine their success. This article examines different expressions of patient and citizen participation and the support health ethics offers. It is contended that despite its prominence and the link between patient empowerment and autonomy, traditional bioethics is insufficient to guide participation efforts. In addition, the turn to a "social paradigm" of ethics in examinations of biotechnologies and public health does not provide an account of values that is commensurable with the pervasive autonomy paradigm. This exacerbates rather than eases tensions for patients and citizens endeavoring to engage with health. Citizen and patient participation must have a significant influence on the way we do health ethics if its potential is to be fulfilled.

摘要

患者和公民参与如今被视为促进可持续健康与医疗保健的核心要素。参与活动会产生并遭遇诸多不同的伦理挑战,这些挑战有可能增强或破坏其成效。本文探讨了患者和公民参与的不同表现形式以及健康伦理学所提供的支持。有人认为,尽管患者赋权与自主性之间的联系备受瞩目,但传统生物伦理学不足以指导参与活动。此外,在生物技术和公共卫生研究中转向伦理学的“社会范式”,并未提供一种与普遍存在的自主性范式相称的价值观描述。这加剧而非缓解了患者和公民在努力参与健康事务时的紧张关系。如果要实现其潜力,公民和患者参与必须对我们开展健康伦理学的方式产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.患者与公民参与卫生保健:加强伦理支持的必要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):4-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900139.
2
A response to the open peer commentaries on "patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support".对关于“患者及公民参与健康:改善伦理支持的必要性”的公开同行评论的回应。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(12):W1-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.964560.
3
Dialogical ethics and responsive evaluation as a framework for patient participation.作为患者参与框架的对话伦理学与回应性评价
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):27-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900143.
4
Patient and public participation in health care: can we do it better?患者及公众参与医疗保健:我们能否做得更好?
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):17-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.903642.
5
Managing disease, or managing the self?: Philosophical challenges to patient participation in (mental) health care and the need for self-management training.管理疾病,还是管理自我?患者参与(精神)卫生保健所面临的哲学挑战以及自我管理培训的必要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):21-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900147.
6
PPI: understanding the difference between patient and public involvement.患者与公众参与(PPI):理解两者之间的差异
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):25-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900144.
7
Ensuring that we promote participation in health for everyone.确保我们促进每个人参与健康事务。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):19-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900151.
8
Community engagement: an important addition to the medical curriculum.社区参与:医学课程的一项重要补充。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):23-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900145.
9
From subjects to experts--on the current transition of patient participation in research.从受试者到专家——论患者参与研究的当前转变
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900148.
10
Which public to involve? More reflection on collective agency and sufficient representativeness is needed.应该让哪些公众参与?需要对集体行动和充分代表性进行更多思考。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):31-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.901435.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in research: a survey on experience, opinions and training needs of gynecologic oncologists in two collaborative groups in Italy.患者及公众参与研究:对意大利两个协作组的妇科肿瘤学家的经验、意见及培训需求的调查
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 31;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00701-7.
2
Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.评估面向公民的数字接触者追踪支持工具的附加价值:框架开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728.
3
Occupational resource profiles for an addressee orientation in occupational health management: a segmentation analysis.职业健康管理中用于收件人定位的职业资源概况:一项细分分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1200798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200798. eCollection 2023.
4
Supporting One Health for Pandemic Prevention: The Need for Ethical Innovation.支持大健康理念以预防大流行病:伦理创新的必要性。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Sep;20(3):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10264-5. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Democratic Justifications for Patient Public Involvement and Engagement in Health Research: An Exploration of the Theoretical Debates and Practical Challenges.民主为患者参与健康研究提供的理由:对理论争议和实践挑战的探索。
J Med Philos. 2023 Jun 20;48(4):400-412. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad024.
6
Citizen engagement in healthcare procurement decision-making by healthcare insurers: recent experiences in the Netherlands.医疗保险公司参与医疗保健采购决策:荷兰的最新经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00939-7.
7
Engagement of older adults in regional health innovation: The ECOTECH concept mapping project.老年人参与区域健康创新:欧洲技术生态概念映射项目。
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan 21;10:20503121211073333. doi: 10.1177/20503121211073333. eCollection 2022.
8
Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review.将体弱和重症患者纳入研究伙伴的伦理考量:一项系统评价的子分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 31;7(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00254-5.
9
The Oncology Family Forum: Collaborating With Families to Codesign Pediatric Oncology Services.肿瘤学家庭论坛:与家庭合作共同设计儿科肿瘤服务。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1671-1677. doi: 10.1177/2374373520950977. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders.营造一种道德文化以支持从物质使用障碍中康复。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 11;47(12):e9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106661.

本文引用的文献

1
Measles - United States, January 1-August 24, 2013.麻疹 - 美国,2013 年 1 月 1 日至 8 月 24 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Sep 13;62(36):741-3.
2
Wales sets up drop-in vaccination clinics to tackle measles outbreak.威尔士设立临时接种诊所应对麻疹疫情。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 16;346:f2452. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2452.
3
Consulting the community: public expectations and attitudes about genetics research.咨询社区:公众对基因研究的期望和态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Dec;21(12):1338-43. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.64. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
4
Providers, payers, the community, and patients are all obliged to get patient activation and engagement ethically right.提供者、支付者、社区和患者都有责任在道德上正确地实现患者的积极性和参与度。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):401-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1081.
5
Rx for the 'blockbuster drug' of patient engagement.患者参与“重磅药物”的处方。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):202. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0037.
6
Responding to patient requests for nonindicated care.回应患者对非必要治疗的请求。
Virtual Mentor. 2011 Jan 1;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.1.ccas3-1101.
7
Routine vaccination: a growing crisis of public confidence.常规疫苗接种:公众信任度日益增长的危机。
Mo Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;109(1):6-9.
8
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.共同决策:真正将患者置于医疗保健的中心。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 27;344:e256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e256.
9
Shared mind: communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness.共享心智:重病中的沟通、决策和自主性。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;9(5):454-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1301.
10
The communitarian turn: myth or reality?社群主义转向:神话还是现实?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Oct;20(4):546-53. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000284.