• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学家庭论坛:与家庭合作共同设计儿科肿瘤服务。

The Oncology Family Forum: Collaborating With Families to Codesign Pediatric Oncology Services.

作者信息

Radford Claire, Slater Penelope J, Fielden Philippa

机构信息

Oncology Services Group, Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1671-1677. doi: 10.1177/2374373520950977. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520950977
PMID:33457629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786683/
Abstract

The Oncology Services Group at Queensland Children's Hospital established an Oncology Family Forum in 2018 to enable codesign of service improvements. A total of 26 family members attended the first 4 Forums, with between 12 and 15 attendees at each. Attendees represented a range of diagnoses, were 85% female, 85% resided within 40 km of the tertiary center, and 26% were on-treatment. In a survey of attendees, 83% agreed that the Forum had improved families' service experience and 92% supported the codesign partnership and the exploration of their suggestions. A small proportion (25%) of attendees disagreed that there was enough time to share, 17% disagreed that all their questions were answered, and 17% disagreed that the Forum represented views of regional families. Respondents identified collaboration, improving understanding and communication as positive aspects of the Forums. Forums will continue to be offered regularly, augmented by videoconferencing (particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic), written responses to family questions and special interest discussion groups. The new collaborations and programs that have been initiated, codesigned, and progressed through these Forums will continue to be the focus of service delivery and quality improvements.

摘要

昆士兰儿童医院肿瘤服务小组于2018年设立了肿瘤学家庭论坛,以共同设计服务改进方案。共有26名家庭成员参加了前4次论坛,每次有12至15名与会者。与会者代表了一系列诊断情况,85%为女性,85%居住在距离三级医疗中心40公里以内,26%正在接受治疗。在对与会者的一项调查中,83%的人认为该论坛改善了家庭的服务体验,92%的人支持共同设计伙伴关系以及对他们建议的探讨。一小部分(25%)与会者不同意有足够时间进行分享,17%的人不同意他们所有问题都得到了回答,17%的人不同意该论坛代表了地区家庭的观点。受访者将合作、增进理解和沟通视为论坛的积极方面。论坛将继续定期举办,并通过视频会议(特别是在新冠疫情期间)、对家庭问题的书面答复以及特别兴趣讨论小组加以补充。通过这些论坛发起、共同设计并推进实施的新合作项目和计划,仍将是服务提供和质量改进的重点。

相似文献

1
The Oncology Family Forum: Collaborating With Families to Codesign Pediatric Oncology Services.肿瘤学家庭论坛:与家庭合作共同设计儿科肿瘤服务。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1671-1677. doi: 10.1177/2374373520950977. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
4
The codesign of an interdisciplinary team-based intervention regarding initiating palliative care in pediatric oncology.跨学科团队合作设计儿科肿瘤姑息治疗启动干预措施。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3249-3256. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4190-5. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
6
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Medical Oncology Professionals' Perceptions of Telehealth Video Visits.医学肿瘤专业人士对远程医疗视频访问的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33967.
8
A regional virtual case discussion forum in pediatric oncology: Experience of the Pediatric Oncology East and Mediterranean Group.儿科肿瘤区域性虚拟病例讨论论坛:儿科肿瘤东地中海组的经验。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Mar;71(3):e30838. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30838. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
9
Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration.与弱势和处境不利人群共同设计卫生和其他公共服务:国际合作的见解。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):284-297. doi: 10.1111/hex.12864. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Supporting self-management after traumatic brain injury: Codesign and evaluation of a new intervention across a trauma pathway.创伤性脑损伤后的自我管理支持:跨创伤路径的一项新干预措施的协同设计与评估
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):632-642. doi: 10.1111/hex.12898. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review.用于医疗保健组织和系统决策中的患者参与度的度量和评估工具:系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):889-903. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43.
2
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.
3
The Oncology Family App: Providing Information and Support for Families Caring for Their Child With Cancer.肿瘤学家庭应用程序:为照顾患癌子女的家庭提供信息与支持。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;35(2):94-102. doi: 10.1177/1043454217741874. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
Patient- and Family-Centered Care: A Primer.以患者和家庭为中心的护理:入门指南。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Dec;13(12 Pt B):1544-1549. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.003.
5
On the Brink of Genuinely Collaborative Care: Experience-Based Co-Design in Mental Health.在真正协作式护理的边缘:心理健康领域基于经验的共同设计
Qual Health Res. 2015 Nov;25(11):1463-76. doi: 10.1177/1049732315576494. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.患者与公民参与卫生保健:加强伦理支持的必要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):4-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900139.