Department of Ophthalmology, New Zealand National Eye Centre, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 15;55(6):3651-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13715.
To examine the repeatability of measurements obtained using a noncontact Scheimpflug-based tonometer (Corvis ST) and investigate potential differences in these parameters between healthy and keratoconic (KC) corneas.
Forty-five keratoconic eyes and 103 healthy eyes were examined using biomicroscopy, corneal tomography and the Corvis ST (CST).
Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness (CCT) were highly repeatable (intraclass correlation [ICC] > 0.70, coefficient of variation [CV] < 0.20). Deformation amplitude (DA) and applanation-1 time (A1T) were fairly repeatable (ICC > 0.60, CV < 0.20). There was no association between DA and age, sex, or ethnicity in healthy eyes. There was a greater mean DA in the KC group compared with 46 age-matched healthy eyes (KC 1.37 ± 0.21 mm, healthy 1.05 ± 0.11 mm, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed DA in KC was predicted by IOP, CCT, and the steepest simulated keratometry value (P = 0.03, P = 0.03, P = 0.001 respectively, R(2) = 0.75). A subgroup analysis of healthy and KC eyes with comparable mean CCT and IOP highlighted a statistically significant difference in mean DA (KC 1.25 ± 0.08 mm, thin healthy 1.13 ± 0.09 mm, P = 0.006). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.93, P = 0.006) but no ideal cutoff value for DA.
Key parameters assessed by the CST are repeatable. Keratoconus is associated with greater DA than in healthy eyes, even when controlled for CCT and IOP. Deformation amplitude may be a useful adjunct in keratoconus assessment and monitoring, but cannot solely discriminate between healthy and keratoconic corneas.
研究非接触式 Scheimpflug 眼压计(Corvis ST)测量值的重复性,并探讨健康角膜和圆锥角膜(KC)角膜之间这些参数的潜在差异。
使用生物显微镜、角膜断层扫描和 Corvis ST(CST)检查 45 只圆锥角膜眼和 103 只健康眼。
眼内压和中央角膜厚度(CCT)的重复性非常高(组内相关系数 [ICC] > 0.70,变异系数 [CV] < 0.20)。变形幅度(DA)和压平 1 时间(A1T)的重复性也相当好(ICC > 0.60,CV < 0.20)。在健康眼中,DA 与年龄、性别或种族之间无相关性。与 46 只年龄匹配的健康眼相比,KC 组的平均 DA 更大(KC 1.37 ± 0.21mm,健康 1.05 ± 0.11mm,P < 0.001)。多元分析显示,KC 中的 DA 由眼压、CCT 和最陡模拟角膜曲率值预测(P = 0.03,P = 0.03,P = 0.001,R² = 0.75)。健康眼和 KC 眼的亚组分析显示,平均 CCT 和 IOP 相似,平均 DA 存在统计学差异(KC 1.25 ± 0.08mm,薄健康 1.13 ± 0.09mm,P = 0.006)。受试者工作特征分析显示曲线下面积为 0.77(95%CI 0.61-0.93,P = 0.006),但 DA 无理想截断值。
CST 评估的关键参数具有可重复性。圆锥角膜的 DA 大于健康眼,即使控制 CCT 和眼压也是如此。变形幅度可能是圆锥角膜评估和监测的有用辅助手段,但不能单独区分健康和圆锥角膜。