Suppr超能文献

宫颈三角钉合吻合术:技术与初步经验。

Cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis: technique and initial experience.

机构信息

1 Division of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China ; 2 Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Jingjiang People's Hospital, Jingjiang 214500, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2014 May;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S350-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.02.06.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and efficacy of modified cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis (TSA) for gastroesophageal anastomosis (GEA) in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

METHODS

From January 2013 to November 2013, eighty-four patients who underwent three-stage MIE was enrolled. During the cervical stage, either circular stapled (CS) or triangulating stapled (TS) anastomosis was applied for GEA. Clinical features were collected and compared to identify the differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included in this study. The clinical characteristics were close between the two groups. Intra-operatively, the duration of GEA was close between the two groups (18±3.4 vs. 17±2.7 min, P=0.139). Post-operatively, Cervical anastomotic leakage occurred in one (3.0%) of the 33 TS patients, but in six (11.8%) of the 51 CS patients (P=0.312). The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was 0.0% and 13.7% in the TS and CS groups, respectively (P=0.069). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in TS than that in CS (15.2% vs. 35.3%, P=0.043). There was no difference in the median length of hospital stay or perioperative mortality rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TSA is a safe and effective alternative for GEA, which would probably lower the incidence of leakage and stenosis following MIE. Further studies based on larger volumes are required to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

探讨改良颈三角吻合(TSA)在微创食管切除术(MIE)中用于胃食管吻合(GEA)的安全性和有效性。

方法

2013 年 1 月至 2013 年 11 月,共纳入 84 例行三阶段 MIE 的患者。在颈部阶段,采用圆形吻合器(CS)或三角吻合器(TS)进行 GEA。收集临床特征并进行比较,以确定两组之间的差异。

结果

本研究共纳入 84 例患者。两组的临床特征相近。术中,两组 GEA 时间相近(18±3.4 与 17±2.7 min,P=0.139)。术后,33 例 TS 患者中有 1 例(3.0%)发生颈部吻合口漏,而 51 例 CS 患者中有 6 例(11.8%)(P=0.312)。吻合口狭窄的发生率分别为 TS 组 0.0%和 CS 组 13.7%(P=0.069)。TS 组术后并发症总发生率明显低于 CS 组(15.2%比 35.3%,P=0.043)。两组患者的中位住院时间和围手术期死亡率无差异。

结论

TSA 是一种安全有效的 GEA 替代方法,可能会降低 MIE 后吻合口漏和狭窄的发生率。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis: technique and initial experience.宫颈三角钉合吻合术:技术与初步经验。
J Thorac Dis. 2014 May;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S350-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.02.06.
10
Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.食管切除术中预置的颈圈式吻合术。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Mar;11(3):723-727. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13324. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验