• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Enhancing Research Ethics Review Systems in Egypt: The Focus of an International Training Program Informed by an Ecological Developmental Approach to Enhancing Research Ethics Capacity.加强埃及的研究伦理审查系统:以增强研究伦理能力的生态发展方法为指导的国际培训计划的重点。
Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Dec;15(3):199-207. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12062. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
2
Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.用于评估低收入和中等收入国家研究伦理委员会运作特征的自我评估工具的结果。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Apr;41(4):332-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101587. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
4
Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.让研究伦理审查在津巴布韦发挥作用——投资当地能力的理由。
Cent Afr J Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;50(11-12):115-9.
5
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.描述性伦理学:对墨西哥当地研究伦理委员会的定性研究。
Dev World Bioeth. 2006 May;6(2):95-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00144.x.
8
Overview on health research ethics in Egypt and North Africa.埃及和北非的健康研究伦理概述。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:87-91. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku110.
9
Current Status of Research Ethics Capacity in Myanmar.缅甸研究伦理能力的现状
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;10(2):123-132. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0054-z. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
10
Enhancing research ethics capacity in the Middle East: experience and challenges of a Fogarty-sponsored training program.提升中东地区的研究伦理能力:一项由福格蒂资助的培训项目的经验与挑战
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):40-51. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.40.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining Malaysia's health research ethics system through a stakeholder driven approach.通过利益相关者驱动的方法来定义马来西亚的健康研究伦理体系。
Dev World Bioeth. 2024 Jun;24(2):74-83. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12396. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
Current Status of Research Ethics Capacity in Myanmar.缅甸研究伦理能力的现状
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;10(2):123-132. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0054-z. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
3
Bioethics training programmes for Africa: evaluating professional and bioethics-related achievements of African trainees after a decade of Fogarty NIH investment.非洲的生物伦理学培训项目:评估在国立卫生研究院福格蒂中心十年投资后非洲学员在专业及生物伦理学相关方面取得的成就。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e012758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012758.
4
Exploring Institutional Research Ethics Systems: A Case Study From Uganda.探索机构研究伦理体系:乌干达的一个案例研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2015;6(3):1-14. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2014.981316. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
Enhancing research ethics capacity in the Middle East: experience and challenges of a Fogarty-sponsored training program.提升中东地区的研究伦理能力:一项由福格蒂资助的培训项目的经验与挑战
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):40-51. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.40.

本文引用的文献

1
Research ethics review: identifying public policy and program gaps.研究伦理审查:识别公共政策与项目差距。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Apr;9(2):3-11. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.3.
2
Enhancing research ethics capacity in the Middle East: experience and challenges of a Fogarty-sponsored training program.提升中东地区的研究伦理能力:一项由福格蒂资助的培训项目的经验与挑战
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):40-51. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.40.
3
Building research ethics capacity in post-communist countries: experience of two Fogarty training programs.在后共产主义国家建设研究伦理能力:两项福格蒂培训项目的经验
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):28-39. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.28.
4
Introduction: the Fogarty International Research Ethics Education and Curriculum Development Program in historical context.引言:历史背景下的福格蒂国际研究伦理教育与课程开发项目
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):3-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.3.
5
Perspectives of Egyptian research ethics committees regarding their effective functioning.埃及研究伦理委员会对其有效运作的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):32-44. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.32.
6
A multicenter study of the awareness and attitudes of Egyptian faculty towards research ethics: a pilot study.埃及教职员工对研究伦理的认知与态度的多中心研究:一项试点研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):99-108. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.99.
7
Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the Middle East: A Pilot Study.中东地区牙科教师对研究伦理的认知、意识和态度:一项试点研究。
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:694759. doi: 10.1155/2011/694759. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
8
Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt.识别埃及研究伦理委员会的结构、流程、资源和需求。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Jun 28;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-12.
9
Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries.从低收入和中等收入国家的研究伦理审查转向研究伦理体系
Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):862-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60488-8.
10
Ethical practices for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization: a retrospective data analysis.世界卫生组织东地中海区域卫生研究的伦理实践:一项回顾性数据分析
PLoS One. 2008 May 7;3(5):e2094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002094.

加强埃及的研究伦理审查系统:以增强研究伦理能力的生态发展方法为指导的国际培训计划的重点。

Enhancing Research Ethics Review Systems in Egypt: The Focus of an International Training Program Informed by an Ecological Developmental Approach to Enhancing Research Ethics Capacity.

作者信息

Edwards Hillary Anne, Hifnawy Tamer, Silverman Henry

出版信息

Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Dec;15(3):199-207. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12062. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1111/dewb.12062
PMID:24894063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4254907/
Abstract

Recently, training programs in research ethics have been established to enhance individual and institutional capacity in research ethics in the developing world. However, commentators have expressed concern that the efforts of these training programs have placed 'too great an emphasis on guidelines and research ethics review', which will have limited effect on ensuring ethical conduct in research. What is needed instead is a culture of ethical conduct supported by national and institutional commitment to ethical practices that are reinforced by upstream enabling conditions (strong civil society, public accountability, and trust in basic transactional processes), which are in turn influenced by developmental conditions (basic freedoms of political freedoms, economic facilities, social opportunities, transparency guarantees, and protective security). Examining this more inclusive understanding of the determinants of ethical conduct enhances at once both an appreciation of the limitations of current efforts of training programs in research ethics and an understanding of what additional training elements are needed to enable trainees to facilitate national and institutional policy changes that enhance research practices. We apply this developmental model to a training program focused in Egypt to describe examples of such additional training activities.

摘要

最近,研究伦理培训项目已在发展中世界建立起来,以提高个人和机构在研究伦理方面的能力。然而,评论家们表示担心,这些培训项目过于强调指导方针和研究伦理审查,这对确保研究中的伦理行为效果有限。相反,需要的是一种由国家和机构对伦理实践的承诺所支持的伦理行为文化,这种承诺由上游的有利条件(强大的公民社会、公共问责制以及对基本交易过程的信任)强化,而这些条件又受到发展条件(政治自由、经济设施、社会机会、透明度保障和保护性安全等基本自由)的影响。审视这种对伦理行为决定因素的更具包容性的理解,既能增强对当前研究伦理培训项目努力局限性的认识,又能理解需要哪些额外的培训要素,以使受训人员能够推动国家和机构的政策变革,从而改进研究实践。我们将这种发展模式应用于一个以埃及为重点的培训项目,以描述此类额外培训活动的实例。