Institute of Public Health - University of Porto (ISPUP), Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
Institute of Public Health - University of Porto (ISPUP), Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):641-55. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu026. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Systematic knowledge on the factors that influence the decisions of IVF users regarding embryo donation for research is a core need for patient-centred policies and ethics in clinical practice. However, no systematic review has been provided on the motivations of patients who must decide embryo disposition. This paper fills this gap, presenting a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies, which synthesizes the current body of knowledge on the factors and reasons associated with IVF patients' decisions to donate or not to donate embryos for research.
A systematic search of studies indexed in PubMed, ISI WoK and PsycINFO, published before November 2013, was conducted. Only empirical, peer-reviewed, full-length, original studies reporting data on factors and reasons associated with the decision concerning donation or non-donation of embryos for research were included. Eligibility and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers and disagreements were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer, if required. The main quantitative findings were extracted and synthesized and qualitative data were assessed by thematic content analysis.
A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. More than half of the studies (n = 21) used a quantitative methodology, and the remaining were qualitative (n = 15) or mixed-methods (n = 3) studies. The studies were derived mainly from European countries (n = 18) and the USA (n = 11). The proportion of IVF users who donated embryos for research varied from 7% in a study in France to 73% in a Swiss study. Those who donate embryos for research reported feelings of reciprocity towards science and medicine, positive views of research and high levels of trust in the medical system. They described their decision as better than the destruction of embryos and as an opportunity to help others or to improve health and IVF treatments. The perception of risks, the lack of information concerning research projects and the medical system and the conceptualization of embryos in terms of personhood were the most relevant motives for not donating embryos for research. Results relating to the influence of sociodemographic characteristics and reproductive and gynaecological history were mostly inconclusive.
Three iterative and dynamic dimensions of the IVF patients' decision to donate or not to donate embryos for research emerged from this review: the hierarquization of the possible options regarding embryo disposition, according to the moral, social and instrumental status attributed to embryos; patients' understanding of expectations and risks of the research on human embryos; and patients' experiences of information exchange and levels of trust in the medical-scientific institutions.
系统了解影响 IVF 患者决定是否将胚胎用于研究的因素,是制定以患者为中心的临床实践政策和伦理学的核心需求。然而,目前还没有对必须做出胚胎处置决定的患者的动机进行系统的综述。本文填补了这一空白,对定量和定性研究进行了系统综述,综合了目前关于 IVF 患者决定捐赠或不捐赠胚胎用于研究的相关因素和原因的知识体系。
对 2013 年 11 月之前发表在 PubMed、ISI WoK 和 PsycINFO 上的研究进行了系统检索。仅纳入报告与捐赠或不捐赠胚胎用于研究的决定相关的因素和原因的实证、同行评审、全文、原始研究。两名独立研究人员进行了资格和数据提取,如果需要,通过讨论或第三名评审员解决分歧。提取并综合了主要的定量研究结果,并通过主题内容分析评估了定性数据。
共有 39 项研究符合纳入标准,并纳入了综述。超过一半的研究(n = 21)使用了定量方法,其余的研究(n = 15)为定性研究或混合方法研究(n = 3)。这些研究主要来自欧洲国家(n = 18)和美国(n = 11)。愿意将胚胎捐赠用于研究的 IVF 患者比例从法国的一项研究中的 7%到瑞士的一项研究中的 73%不等。那些捐赠胚胎用于研究的人表示,他们对科学和医学有互惠感,对研究有积极的看法,对医疗系统有高度的信任。他们认为自己的决定比销毁胚胎更好,是帮助他人或改善健康和 IVF 治疗的机会。对风险的感知、对研究项目和医疗系统的信息缺乏以及将胚胎概念化为个体,是不捐赠胚胎用于研究的最相关动机。与社会人口特征和生殖妇科史的影响相关的结果大多没有定论。
从本次综述中出现了三个迭代和动态的 IVF 患者决定是否捐赠或不捐赠胚胎用于研究的维度:根据赋予胚胎的道德、社会和工具地位,对胚胎处置的可能选择进行层次化;患者对人类胚胎研究的期望和风险的理解;以及患者对信息交流和对医疗科学机构的信任水平的体验。