• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口与传统多端口袖状胃切除术的结果分析:一项匹配队列研究。

Outcome analysis of single incision vs traditional multiport sleeve gastrectomy: a matched cohort study.

作者信息

Gomberawalla Ameer, Salamat Arsalan, Lutfi Rami

机构信息

Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago Institute of Advanced Bariatric Surgery, 2900 N Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60657, USA,

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2014 Nov;24(11):1870-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1312-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-014-1312-0
PMID:24908243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single incision laparoscopy remains controversial due to technical challenges which may cause suboptimal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and equivalency of the single incision sleeve gastrectomy (SISG) when compared to the traditional multiport sleeve gastrectomy (MPSG) approach in a matched cohort evaluating technical aspects and postoperative results.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a consecutive cohort of 113 SG (MPSG = 77, SISG = 36). The 36 patients who underwent SISG were included as the case group. Thirty-six MPSG patients were included in the control group, in 1:1 ratio with cases after matching for BMI, age, race, gender, and additional demographic data. Operative time (OT) in minutes and length of stay (LOS) in days was measured and excess weight loss (EWL) at 6 months and 1 year was collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean BMI was equivalent (SISG 43.06, MPSG 43.72, p = 0.36). Mean OT for the SISG was 116.78 and 118.25 for the MPSG (p = 0.84), and mean LOS was 1.80 for the SISG and 1.75 for the MSPG (p = 0.75). EWL at 6 months was 58.4 % for the SISG and 58.5 % for the MPSG (p = 0.98) and 72.3 and 74.1 % (p = 0.77) for 1 year, respectively. There were no leaks in either group. There was one reoperation for postoperative bleeding in the MPSG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleeve gastrectomy can be performed safely using single incision techniques with equivalent outcomes for weight loss.

摘要

背景

由于技术挑战可能导致效果欠佳,单切口腹腔镜手术仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估单切口袖状胃切除术(SISG)与传统多端口袖状胃切除术(MPSG)相比在匹配队列中的可行性和等效性,评估技术方面和术后结果。

方法

这是一项对前瞻性收集的连续113例袖状胃切除术患者(MPSG = 77例,SISG = 36例)数据的回顾性分析。接受SISG的36例患者作为病例组。36例MPSG患者作为对照组,在匹配BMI、年龄、种族、性别和其他人口统计学数据后与病例组按1:1比例纳入。测量手术时间(OT,分钟)和住院时间(LOS,天),并收集和评估6个月和1年时的超重减轻(EWL)情况。

结果

平均BMI相当(SISG为43.06,MPSG为43.72,p = 0.36)。SISG的平均OT为116.78分钟,MPSG为118.25分钟(p = 0.84),SISG的平均LOS为1.80天,MSPG为1.75天(p = 0.75)。6个月时SISG的EWL为58.4%,MPSG为58.5%(p = 0.98),1年时分别为72.3%和74.1%(p = 0.77)。两组均无渗漏。MPSG组有1例因术后出血再次手术。

结论

使用单切口技术进行袖状胃切除术可安全实施,减重效果相当。

相似文献

1
Outcome analysis of single incision vs traditional multiport sleeve gastrectomy: a matched cohort study.单切口与传统多端口袖状胃切除术的结果分析:一项匹配队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2014 Nov;24(11):1870-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1312-0.
2
Weight-loss outcomes of SPIDER(®) sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months compared to traditional laparoscopic technique.与传统腹腔镜技术相比,SPIDER(®)袖状胃切除术6个月时的减重效果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2043-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4451-z. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
3
Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A 2-year comparative analysis of 600 patients.单孔袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:600例患者的2年比较分析
Obes Surg. 2015 Apr;25(4):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1461-1.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:单中心80例病例分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):83-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0250. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
5
Routine gastric suspension technique in single-port sleeve gastrectomy procedure.单孔套管胃切除术的常规胃悬吊技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9651-9657. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10502-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
6
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年内实现的体重减轻效果相当。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
7
Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched multicenter study.单吻合口袖状空肠旁路术(SASI)与袖状胃切除术的对比:一项病例匹配的多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):652-660. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07430-w. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
8
Repeat sleeve gastrectomy: optimization of outcomes by modifying the indications and technique.重复袖状胃切除术:通过修改适应证和技术优化结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Apr;14(4):490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.025. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity in 3003 Patients: Results at a High-Volume Bariatric Center.3003例病态肥胖患者的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一家高容量减肥中心的结果
Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):2045-2050. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2063-x.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术
Am Surg. 2013 Apr;79(4):393-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.缩小切口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Dec;34(12):4519-4530. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07555-0. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.单切口与传统多端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46956. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Magnetic-Assisted Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在美容评分方面具有优势,但疝的发生率显著升高:传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前瞻性随机、多中心、单盲临床试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
2
The evolution of minimally invasive bariatric surgery.微创减重手术的发展历程。
J Surg Res. 2013 Aug;183(2):559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.036. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
3
磁辅助小切口袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的对比研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2261-2265. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06628-w. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在亚洲病态肥胖患者中的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1.
5
Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbidly Obese Japanese Patients: a Retrospective Case-Matched Study.经脐单部位腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症的临床研究 摘要:目的探讨经脐单部位腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SILS-SG)治疗病态肥胖症的安全性和有效性。方法选取 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月于我院接受 SILS-SG 的 52 例病态肥胖症患者为观察组,另选取同期接受传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的 52 例病态肥胖症患者为对照组。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率、术后 1 年的减重效果。结果观察组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间均明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后均未发生严重并发症,观察组的术后并发症发生率为 3.85%,明显低于对照组的 13.46%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后 1 年,两组患者的 BMI、腰围、体质量均明显下降,且观察组的下降幅度明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SILS-SG 治疗病态肥胖症安全有效,具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3291-3298. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03987-1.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.五种缝钉线加固方案在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中漏率的比较:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):396-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于单切口内镜手术的共识声明。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
8
Prospective Comparison and Quality of Life for Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Series of Morbidly Obese Patients.一系列病态肥胖患者单切口与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的前瞻性比较及生活质量
Obes Surg. 2017 Mar;27(3):681-687. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2338-2.
9
Postoperative Bleeding and Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Experience.袖状胃切除术后的出血与渗漏:单中心经验
Obes Surg. 2016 Dec;26(12):2944-2951. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2215-z.
10
Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.在改良技能训练器中,标准腹腔镜检查与单切口腹腔镜检查的任务表现比较。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3591-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4658-z. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.减重手术构成的变化:腹腔镜袖状胃切除术全国应用的增加。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
4
Psychological outcomes and predictors of initial weight loss outcomes among severely obese adolescents receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.严重肥胖青少年接受腹腔镜可调胃束带手术后的心理结果及其与初始减重效果的关系。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;73(10):1351-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07690.
5
Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study.经脐单孔套管胃切除术:初步经验和对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1247-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2002-9. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
6
Smoking and adipose tissue inflammation suppress leptin expression in Japanese obese males: potential mechanism of resistance to weight loss among Japanese obese smokers.吸烟与脂肪组织炎症抑制日本肥胖男性的瘦素表达:日本肥胖吸烟者体重减轻抵抗的潜在机制。
Tob Induc Dis. 2012 Feb 28;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-10-3.
7
Laparo-endoscopic single-site sleeve gastrectomy: results from a preliminary series of selected patients.腹腔镜单孔袖状胃切除术:一组特定患者初步系列研究的结果
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Jan;21(1):40-5. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.651474. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
8
Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--a randomised pilot study.单切口袖状胃切除术与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的随机对照研究
Obes Surg. 2011 Nov;21(11):1664-70. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic bariatric surgery.单切口腹腔镜减肥手术。
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jan;7(1):99-103. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72397.
10
Changes in lipid profiles in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后病态肥胖患者血脂谱的变化。
Obes Surg. 2011 Mar;21(3):305-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0285-x.