Universität Würzburg, Biozentrum, Lehrstuhl für Genetik und Neurobiologie, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Universität Würzburg, Biozentrum, Lehrstuhl für Genetik und Neurobiologie, 97074 Würzburg, Germany Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Institut für Biologie, Verhaltensgenetik, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Center for Behavioral Brain Science (CBBS), 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie (LIN), Abteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany
J Exp Biol. 2014 Jun 15;217(Pt 12):2071-7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.100966.
Similarity between odours is notoriously difficult to measure. Widely used behavioural approaches in insect olfaction research are cross-adaptation, masking, as well as associative tasks based on olfactory learning and the subsequent testing for how specific the established memory is. A concern with such memory-based approaches is that the learning process required to establish an odour memory may alter the way the odour is processed, such that measures of perception taken at the test are distorted. The present study was therefore designed to see whether behavioural judgements of perceptual distance are different for two different memory-based tasks, namely generalization and discrimination. We used odour-reward learning in larval Drosophila as a study case. In order to challenge the larvae's olfactory system, we chose to work with binary mixtures and their elements (1-octanol, n-amyl acetate, 3-octanol, benzaldehyde and hexyl acetate). We determined the perceptual distance between each mixture and its elements, first in a generalization task, and then in a discrimination task. It turns out that scores of perceptual distance are correlated between both tasks. A re-analysis of published studies looking at element-to-element perceptual distances in larval reward learning and in adult punishment learning confirms this result. We therefore suggest that across a given set of olfactory stimuli, associative training does not grossly alter the pattern of perceptual distances.
气味的相似性很难衡量。昆虫嗅觉研究中广泛使用的行为方法包括交叉适应、掩蔽,以及基于嗅觉学习的联想任务,以及随后测试已建立的记忆的特异性。基于记忆的方法存在一个问题,即建立气味记忆所需的学习过程可能会改变气味的处理方式,从而导致测试中的感知测量值发生扭曲。因此,本研究旨在观察两种不同的基于记忆的任务,即泛化和辨别,对感知距离的行为判断是否不同。我们使用幼虫果蝇的气味奖励学习作为研究案例。为了挑战幼虫的嗅觉系统,我们选择使用二元混合物及其成分(1-辛醇、正戊基乙酸酯、3-辛醇、苯甲醛和己基乙酸酯)。我们首先在泛化任务中,然后在辨别任务中确定每个混合物与其成分之间的感知距离。结果表明,两种任务的感知距离评分之间存在相关性。对幼虫奖励学习和成虫惩罚学习中元素间感知距离的已发表研究的重新分析证实了这一结果。因此,我们认为在给定的一组嗅觉刺激中,联想训练不会严重改变感知距离的模式。