Dachowski M T, Kalayjian R, Angelillo J C, Dolan E A
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Mar;47(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90224-3.
Three anesthetic techniques were compared in this study: 1) Intermittent Brevital boluses supplemented with fentanyl and midazolam all titrated to patient movement, 2) constant infusion of Brevital supplemented with fentanyl and midazolam all delivered in calculated mg/kg doses based on total body weight, and 3) constant infusion of methohexital (Brevital) and alfentanil (Alfenta) supplemented by midazolam (Versed), droperidol, and glycopyrolate (Robinul) delivered in calculated mg/kg doses based on lean body mass. Nitrous oxide was delivered in all cases via nasal mask in a 30% to 50% concentration. The mean total dose of Brevital in group 1 (intermittent Brevital bolus) was 0.17 mg/kg/min (SD = 0.07), group 2 (Brevital infusion) was 0.23 mg/kg/min (SD = 0.06), and group 3 (alfentanil/Brevital infusion) was 0.12 mg/kg/min (SD = 0.07). Mean total dose of alfentanil in group 3 equaled 1.58 mcg/kg/min (SD = 0.73). In group 1, 94% of the patients experienced moderate to severe movement intraoperatively. Twenty-three percent of the patients in group 2, and only 7% of group 3 exhibited moderate to severe movement. Emergence in group 3 averaged 4.5 minutes (SD = 1.6). Three patients (7%) in group 3 had postoperative nausea. Additional subjective findings in group 3 included easier airway maintenance during administration of the anesthetic, lack of unpleasant emergence phenomena such as crying, and prompt readiness for discharge. It was concluded that continuous alfentanil and Brevital infusion satisfied the objectives of safety, stability, predictability, and rapid recovery, while improving operating conditions (less patient movement) when compared with more traditional anesthetic techniques.
1)间断静脉注射硫喷妥钠,辅以芬太尼和咪达唑仑,均根据患者的反应进行滴定;2)持续输注硫喷妥钠,辅以芬太尼和咪达唑仑,均根据总体重以计算出的毫克/千克剂量给药;3)持续输注美索比妥(硫喷妥钠)和阿芬太尼(阿芬他尼),辅以咪达唑仑(力月西)、氟哌利多和格隆溴铵(胃长宁),均根据瘦体重以计算出的毫克/千克剂量给药。所有病例均通过鼻罩以30%至50%的浓度给予氧化亚氮。第1组(间断硫喷妥钠静脉推注)硫喷妥钠的平均总剂量为0.17毫克/千克/分钟(标准差=0.07),第2组(硫喷妥钠输注)为0.23毫克/千克/分钟(标准差=0.06),第3组(阿芬太尼/硫喷妥钠输注)为0.12毫克/千克/分钟(标准差=0.07)。第3组阿芬太尼的平均总剂量等于1.58微克/千克/分钟(标准差=0.73)。第1组中,94%的患者在术中出现中度至重度肢体活动。第2组中有23%的患者,而第3组中只有7%的患者出现中度至重度肢体活动。第3组的苏醒平均时间为4.5分钟(标准差=1.6)。第3组中有3名患者(7%)出现术后恶心。第3组的其他主观结果包括麻醉给药期间气道维持更容易、没有诸如哭闹等不愉快的苏醒现象以及出院准备迅速。得出的结论是,与更传统的麻醉技术相比,持续输注阿芬太尼和硫喷妥钠满足了安全、稳定、可预测和快速恢复的目标,同时改善了手术条件(减少患者肢体活动)。