Hansen N V, Brændgaard P, Hjørnholm C, la Cour S
Center for Research in Existence and Society (CRES), Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Oct;68(10):1129-33. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.106. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study is an experiment of putting social sciences to work in developing a support intervention for healthy lifestyle changes that would be attractive and manageable in real-life settings. Starting with a hypothesis that a class of intervention methods based on an unconventional 'low-tension' strategy may offer an effective support of stable, long-term changes well integrated in everyday life, difficult to maintain with conventional dieting and self-control approaches, this study focuses on designing and optimizing an intervention model combining several low-tension methods: mindfulness, small steps and group support.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: In three consecutive 'action research' cycles, the intervention was run in practice with groups of 20 overweight or obese citizens. Qualitative data, mainly in the form of recorded group sessions and individual interviews with group participants and group leaders, were systematically collected and analyzed, using a framework of social psychological theory to focus on difficulties, resources and meanings connected with habits and everyday life. This information was recycled into the design process for the next version of the intervention.
We describe the user-involving development processes toward a more attractive and manageable intervention model. The model now exists as a well-articulated package whose effectiveness is being tested in a randomized controlled trial study.
Social science can be put to work in systematically integrating real-life experience in a development process. It answers a very different kind of question than clinical trials-filling another place in an overall research program to create useful knowledge of what helps-in complex, everyday, real life.
背景/目的:本研究是一项将社会科学应用于开发健康生活方式改变支持干预措施的实验,该干预措施在现实生活环境中应具有吸引力且易于管理。本研究始于一个假设,即一类基于非常规“低压力”策略的干预方法可能为稳定、长期的改变提供有效支持,这些改变能很好地融入日常生活,而传统节食和自我控制方法难以维持这种改变。本研究聚焦于设计和优化一种结合多种低压力方法的干预模型:正念、小步骤和团体支持。
受试者/方法:在连续三个“行动研究”周期中,对20名超重或肥胖市民组成的群体进行了实际干预。系统收集并分析了定性数据,主要形式为小组会议记录以及对小组成员和组长的个人访谈,运用社会心理学理论框架来关注与习惯和日常生活相关的困难、资源及意义。这些信息被反馈到下一版干预措施的设计过程中。
我们描述了朝着更具吸引力且易于管理的干预模型的用户参与式开发过程。该模型现已成为一个阐述清晰的方案包,其有效性正在一项随机对照试验研究中进行测试。
社会科学可应用于在开发过程中系统整合现实生活经验。它回答的问题与临床试验截然不同——在整体研究项目中填补另一个位置,以创造关于在复杂、日常、现实生活中何种因素有帮助的有用知识。